KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$1.53B
5Y Perf.-21.5%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WELL
Welltower Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$149.25B
5Y Perf.+320.4%
EQR
Equity Residential
REIT - Residential
Market Cap$24.68B
5Y Perf.+8.8%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$41.15B
5Y Perf.+147.6%
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | KW | WELL | EQR | VTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $1.53B | $149.25B | $24.68B | $41.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $501M | $11.63B | $3.12B | $6.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $1.43B | $954M | $260M |
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | 39.1% | 46.3% | -4.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.4% | 28.5% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 78.4x | 50.6x | 118.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.51B | $21.38B | $8.78B | $13.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $-3M | $5.03B | $56M | $741M |
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
KW
WELL
EQR
VTR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kennedy-Wilson Hold… (KW) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EQR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. WELL and VTR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
KW
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
KW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 4.5% yield, vs EQR's 4.1%
- +73.8% vs EQR's -2.7%
Best for: dividends and momentum
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
WELL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KW's -5.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
EQR
Equity Residential
The Real Estate Income Play
EQR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 4.1%
- Lower P/E (50.6x vs 118.0x)
- 30.6% margin vs KW's 0.9%
- 4.6% ROA vs KW's 0.1%, ROIC 4.2% vs 0.6%
Best for: income & stability
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 184.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs KW's 0.73, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WELL | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs KW's -5.7% |
| Value | EQR | Lower P/E (50.6x vs 118.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQR | 30.6% margin vs KW's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | VTR | Beta 0.01 vs KW's 0.73, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KW | 4.5% yield, vs EQR's 4.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KW | +73.8% vs EQR's -2.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EQR | 4.6% ROA vs KW's 0.1%, ROIC 4.2% vs 0.6% |
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2020
FY 2025
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEQRLAGGINGVTR
Who Leads Where
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories
KW leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓VTRVentas, Inc.
0leads
WELLWelltower Inc.
1leads
KWKennedy-Wilson Holdin…
1leads
EQREquity Residential
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KWvs WELLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EQR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
KW4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EQR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WELL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 23.2x KW's $501M. EQR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KW's 0.9%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $501M | $11.6B | $3.1B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $185M | $2.8B | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $1.4B | $954M | $260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $2.5B | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +39.1% | +46.3% | -4.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.4% | +28.5% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +12.3% | +30.6% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +21.9% | +42.7% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.0% | +40.3% | +2.5% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +22.5% | -64.2% | 0.0% |
EQR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
KW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 86% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EQR's 15.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $149.2B | $24.7B | $41.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $165.6B | $33.4B | $53.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -39.32x | 153.25x | 22.63x | 160.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 78.42x | 50.61x | 118.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.63x | 66.40x | 15.61x | 24.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.06x | 13.99x | 7.96x | 7.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 3.35x | 2.24x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.91x | 52.41x | 19.13x | 31.25x |
KW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $0 for KW. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KW's 2.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs VTR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.3% | +3.5% | +8.4% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +2.3% | +4.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +0.5% | +4.2% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +0.6% | +5.7% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.86x | 0.49x | 0.77x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $16.3B | $8.7B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | -$3M | $5.0B | $56M | $741M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $21.4B | $8.8B | $13.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 0.26x | 5.58x | 1.40x |
EQR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,278 for KW. Over the past 12 months, KW leads with a +73.8% total return vs EQR's -2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs KW's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +14.3% | +8.4% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.8% | +42.7% | -2.7% | +33.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | +189.5% | +17.5% | +94.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.2% | +202.3% | +6.7% | +74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.3% | +223.1% | +29.3% | +65.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +42.5% | +5.5% | +24.8% |
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KW and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KW's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KW currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs EQR's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.13x | 0.38x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.09 | $219.59 | $71.80 | $88.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.98 | $142.65 | $57.58 | $61.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +97.0% | +91.7% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.6 | 60.2 | 69.8 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.6M | 2.4M | 3.4M |
Evenly matched — KW and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KW and EQR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KW as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", EQR as "Hold", VTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for EQR (target: $70) vs 4.9% for VTR (target: $91). For income investors, KW offers the higher dividend yield at 4.48% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | KWKennedy-Wilson Ho… | WELLWelltower Inc. | EQREquity Residential | VTRVentas, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 | $70.15 | $90.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 34 | 46 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $2.76 | $2.69 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — KW and EQR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallEquity Residential (EQR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
KW vs WELL vs EQR vs VTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KW or WELL or EQR or VTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Equity Residential is actually cheaper at 50. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus KW's -8. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning KW is approximately 7542% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 3% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -5. 7% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 0. 9% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQR leads at 46. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KW or WELL or EQR or VTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Equity Residential (EQR) trades at 50.
6x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 67. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQR: 6. 5% to $70. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — KW or WELL or EQR or VTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is KW or WELL or EQR or VTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, KW: -8. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KW and WELL and EQR and VTR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(KW: -11.0% · WELL: 40.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.