Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Specialty Retail
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $20M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209K | $45.18B | $97.26B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -42.9% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.5x | 16.5x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $168K | $14.46B | $44.88B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $86.81B |
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KWM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 1.95x
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- PEG 0.74 vs AMZN's 1.24
DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 34.8x)
- 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.7% vs KWM's -87.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs KWM's -42.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs KWM's -87.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs KWM's -101.7% |
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
DIS leads 1 • KWM leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 3558992.6x KWM's $208,704. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWM's -42.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208,704 | $45.2B | $97.3B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B | $20.5B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B | $11.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B | $7.1B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.5% | +20.9% | +7.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.6% | +6.5% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.1% | -29.8% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 58% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.24x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 16.53x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 12.10x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 95.65x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 19.11x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-149 for KWM. KWM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -148.5% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.7% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -146.5% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167,826 | $14.5B | $44.9B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 9.95x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,207 for KWM. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs KWM's -87.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs KWM's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | -3.0% | -2.8% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.9% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +75.2% | -39.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.6% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs KWM's 3.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.48 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.7% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 646K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.59 | $139.50 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KWM vs NFLX vs DIS vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -87. 9% for K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus KWM's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately 324% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -42. 8% for K Wave Media Ltd. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -42. 9% for KWM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 0% to $115. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KWM, NFLX, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KWM or NFLX or DIS or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +866. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +866. 6%, KWM: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KWM and NFLX and DIS and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (KWM (Financial Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KWM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DIS pays a dividend while KWM, NFLX, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.