Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KWM vs SPOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
KWM vs SPOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $20M | $87.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209K | $17.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $2.72B |
| Gross Margin | 0.7% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | -42.9% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $168K | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $5.26B |
KWM vs SPOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KWM vs SPOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KWM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 1.95x
SPOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.66
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs KWM's -87.9%
- Beta 0.66, current ratio 1.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs KWM's -42.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs KWM's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.0% vs KWM's -87.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.3% ROA vs KWM's -101.7% |
KWM vs SPOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KWM vs SPOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.6B annually — 84346.9x KWM's $208,704. SPOT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KWM's -42.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208,704 | $17.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.9% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.8% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -38.5% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KWM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $88.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $84.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.24x | 34.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 32.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 31.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 95.65x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 9.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOT delivers a 35.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-149 for KWM. KWM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPOT's 0.28x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -148.5% | +35.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -101.7% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -146.5% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $167,826 | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 84.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPOT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOT five years ago would be worth $17,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,207 for KWM. Over the past 12 months, SPOT leads with a -35.0% total return vs KWM's -87.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 43.5% vs KWM's -50.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.9% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +195.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +78.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.9% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.6% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SPOT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KWM's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPOT currently trades 54.4% from its 52-week high vs KWM's 3.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.48 | $785.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $405.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.7% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.9 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 646K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $630.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.6% |
SPOT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KWM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
KWM vs SPOT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KWM or SPOT a better buy right now?
Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) offers the better valuation at 34. 6x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KWM or SPOT?
Over the past 5 years, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) delivered a total return of +78. 5%, compared to -87. 9% for K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPOT returned +186. 8% versus KWM's -87. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KWM or SPOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus K Wave Media Ltd. 's 0. 90β — meaning KWM is approximately 37% more volatile than SPOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, K Wave Media Ltd. (KWM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 28% for Spotify Technology S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — KWM or SPOT?
Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -42. 8% for K Wave Media Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOT leads at 12. 8% versus -42. 9% for KWM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOT leads at 32. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — KWM or SPOT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is KWM or SPOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spotify Technology S.
A. (SPOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +186. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOT: +186. 8%, KWM: -87. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between KWM and SPOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (KWM (Financial Services) and SPOT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.