Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SPOT vs SIRI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • LU
Market Cap$86.00B
5Y Perf.+130.9%
SIRI
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.12B
5Y Perf.-53.4%

SPOT vs SIRI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SPOT logoSPOT
SIRI logoSIRI
IndustryInternet Content & InformationEntertainment
Market Cap$86.00B$9.12B
Revenue (TTM)$17.60B$8.58B
Net Income (TTM)$2.72B$846M
Gross Margin32.3%45.4%
Operating Margin13.7%18.0%
Forward P/E32.3x8.7x
Total Debt$2.32B$9.71B
Cash & Equiv.$5.26B$94M

SPOT vs SIRILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SPOT
SIRI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Spotify Technology … (SPOT)100230.9+130.9%
Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI)10046.6-53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SPOT vs SIRI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SPOT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
The Income Pick

SPOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.57
  • Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 91.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
  • 180.4% 10Y total return vs SIRI's -6.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SIRI
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
The Value Play

SIRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (8.7x vs 32.3x)
  • 3.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
  • +29.7% vs SPOT's -36.2%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSPOT logoSPOT9.7% revenue growth vs SIRI's -1.6%
ValueSIRI logoSIRILower P/E (8.7x vs 32.3x)
Quality / MarginsSPOT logoSPOT15.5% margin vs SIRI's 9.9%
Stability / SafetySPOT logoSPOTBeta 0.57 vs SIRI's 0.63, lower leverage
DividendsSIRI logoSIRI3.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SIRI logoSIRI+29.7% vs SPOT's -36.2%
Efficiency (ROA)SPOT logoSPOT19.3% ROA vs SIRI's 3.1%, ROIC 40.5% vs 5.2%

SPOT vs SIRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SPOTSpotify Technology S.A.
FY 2024
Premium
88.2%$14.9B
Ad-Supported
11.8%$2.0B
SIRISirius XM Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
77.4%$6.5B
Advertising
21.1%$1.8B
Other Revenue
1.5%$122M

SPOT vs SIRI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSPOTLAGGINGSIRI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SPOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.6B annually — 2.1x SIRI's $8.6B. SPOT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIRI's 9.9%. On growth, SPOT holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17.6B$8.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.5B$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.7B$846M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.2B$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.3%+45.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.7%+18.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.5%+9.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%+1.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+22.0%
SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SIRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.0x trailing earnings, SIRI trades at a 64% valuation discount to SPOT's 33.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIRI's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPOT's 30.6x.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
Market CapShares × price$86.0B$9.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$82.6B$18.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS33.88x12.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.28x8.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.59x9.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.26x1.07x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.00x0.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.52x7.33x
SIRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SPOT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

SPOT delivers a 35.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $7 for SIRI. SPOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIRI's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPOT scores 6/9 vs SIRI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.3%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+19.3%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+40.5%+5.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.7%+6.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x0.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.9B$9.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.3B$94M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$9.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense84.99x3.50x
SPOT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SPOT five years ago would be worth $18,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,751 for SIRI. Over the past 12 months, SIRI leads with a +29.7% total return vs SPOT's -36.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPOT at 42.5% vs SIRI's -5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.3%+33.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.2%+29.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+189.1%-16.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.1%-42.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+180.4%-6.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.5%-5.9%
SPOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPOT and SIRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SIRI's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIRI currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs SPOT's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$785.00$28.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$405.00$19.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+53.2%+94.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.160.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M4.8M
Evenly matched — SPOT and SIRI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates SPOT as "Buy" and SIRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.0% upside for SPOT (target: $623) vs 2.6% for SIRI (target: $28). SIRI is the only dividend payer here at 3.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSPOT logoSPOTSpotify Technolog…SIRI logoSIRISirius XM Holding…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$622.62$27.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts5232
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+1.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SPOT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIRI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSpotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SPOT vs SIRI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SPOT or SIRI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Spotify Technology S.

A. (SPOT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SPOT or SIRI?

On trailing P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

(SIRI) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Spotify Technology S. A. at 33. 9x. On forward P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SPOT or SIRI?

Over the past 5 years, Spotify Technology S.

A. (SPOT) delivered a total return of +83. 1%, compared to -42. 5% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPOT returned +180. 4% versus SIRI's -6. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SPOT or SIRI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spotify Technology S.

A. (SPOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Sirius XM Holdings Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning SIRI is approximately 12% more volatile than SPOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spotify Technology S. A. (SPOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 84% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SPOT or SIRI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Spotify Technology S.

A. (SPOT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to 91. 1% for Spotify Technology S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPOT leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SPOT or SIRI?

Spotify Technology S.

A. (SPOT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 9. 4% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIRI leads at 17. 2% versus 12. 8% for SPOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SIRI leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SPOT or SIRI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

(SIRI) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 32. 3x for Spotify Technology S. A. — 23. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOT: 49. 0% to $622. 62.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SPOT or SIRI?

In this comparison, SIRI (3.

8% yield) pays a dividend. SPOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SPOT or SIRI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

(SIRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIRI: -6. 9%, SPOT: +180. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SPOT and SIRI?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock. SIRI pays a dividend while SPOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SPOT

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SIRI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SPOT and SIRI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SPOT: 10.0% · SIRI: 1.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(SPOT: 15.5% · SIRI: 9.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SPOT: 33.9x · SIRI: 12.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.