Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Financial - Capital Markets
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Financial - Capital Markets | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $21.48B | $22.52B | $10.62B | $11.82B | $64.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.29B | $16.57B | $10.82B | $14.82B | $48.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.87B | $1.77B | $819M | $1.33B | $6.29B |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 61.4% | 59.7% | 33.4% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 13.9% | 6.3% | 10.6% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 16.0x | 14.7x | 9.1x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $9.49B | $4.30B | $1.77B | $2.97B | $9.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $495M | $3.96B | $14.04B | $425M | $842M |
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loews Corporation (L) | 100 | 314.1 | +214.1% |
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| Jefferies Financial… (JEF) | 100 | 367.6 | +267.6% |
| CNA Financial Corpo… (CNA) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
L is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 5.4% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
- +19.2% vs MKL's -4.1%
MKL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, JEF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 8.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 0.38x
- Beta 0.24, yield 8.8%, current ratio 0.38x
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.69 vs 11.15
TRV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 27.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 201.4% 10Y total return vs JEF's 300.2%
- PEG 0.51 vs JEF's 11.15
- 12.9% margin vs JEF's 6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.69 vs 11.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs JEF's 6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs JEF's 1.97 | |
| Dividends | 8.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.2% vs MKL's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs JEF's 1.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs 2.4% |
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRV leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNA leads 1 • JEF leads 1 • L leads 0 • MKL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.8B annually — 4.5x JEF's $10.8B. TRV is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JEF's 6.6%. On growth, MKL holds the edge at +6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.3B | $16.6B | $10.8B | $14.8B | $48.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $2.5B | $24M | $1.6B | $8.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $1.8B | $819M | $1.3B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $2.2B | $911M | $2.2B | $7.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +61.4% | +59.7% | +33.4% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +13.9% | +6.3% | +10.6% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +10.7% | +6.6% | +9.0% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +13.2% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +6.7% | — | +3.0% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -2.6% | -8.6% | -22.0% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CNA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CNA trades at a 49% valuation discount to JEF's 18.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MKL offers better value at 0.43x vs JEF's 13.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.5B | $22.5B | $10.6B | $11.8B | $64.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.5B | $22.9B | -$1.7B | $14.4B | $73.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.10x | 10.64x | 18.19x | 9.32x | 10.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.99x | 14.75x | 9.05x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.43x | 13.75x | 0.71x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.54x | 7.78x | -1.89x | 8.50x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.18x | 1.36x | 0.98x | 0.80x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.20x | 1.08x | 1.02x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.96x | 8.82x | 31.88x | 4.92x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRV delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $8 for JEF. JEF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to L's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), L scores 7/9 vs JEF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +9.6% | +7.7% | +11.9% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +3.0% | +1.1% | +2.0% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +10.7% | +2.4% | +8.9% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +14.9% | +1.1% | +6.1% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.23x | 0.17x | 0.26x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.0B | $339M | -$12.3B | $2.5B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $495M | $4.0B | $14.0B | $425M | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.5B | $4.3B | $1.8B | $3.0B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.93x | 12.00x | 0.05x | 12.31x | 19.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JEF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRV five years ago would be worth $19,818 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,700 for CNA. Over the past 12 months, L leads with a +19.2% total return vs MKL's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JEF at 22.6% vs MKL's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.2% | -15.5% | -18.3% | -1.5% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.2% | -4.1% | +8.9% | -1.6% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.8% | +31.0% | +84.2% | +37.2% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.8% | +47.5% | +78.6% | +27.0% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.2% | +89.3% | +300.2% | +136.4% | +201.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +9.4% | +22.6% | +11.1% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TRV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRV is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JEF's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRV currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs JEF's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.44x | 1.97x | 0.24x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.90 | $2207.59 | $71.04 | $50.72 | $313.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.59 | $1719.41 | $35.53 | $42.77 | $249.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +81.5% | +72.5% | +86.1% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 34.5 | 70.9 | 30.7 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 624K | 59K | 2.8M | 440K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CNA and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: L as "Buy", MKL as "Hold", JEF as "Buy", CNA as "Hold", TRV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.6% upside for JEF (target: $68) vs 3.0% for CNA (target: $45). For income investors, CNA offers the higher dividend yield at 8.80% vs L's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1950.00 | $67.75 | $45.00 | $313.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 15 | 9 | 7 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.7% | +3.3% | +8.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $48.55 | $1.68 | $3.85 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +1.9% | +0.6% | +0.3% | +4.8% |
TRV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
L vs MKL vs JEF vs CNA vs TRV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loews Corporation (L) is the stronger pick with 5.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Loews Corporation (L) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
On trailing P/E, CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. at 18. 2x. On forward P/E, CNA Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Travelers Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 51x versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. 's 11. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
Over the past 5 years, The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) delivered a total return of +98. 2%, compared to +27. 0% for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JEF returned +300. 2% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. 's 1. 97β — meaning JEF is approximately 787% more volatile than TRV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 48% for Loews Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loews Corporation (L) is pulling ahead at 5.
4% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CNA Financial Corporation grew EPS 33. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKL leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus 6. 6% for Jefferies Financial Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKL leads at 16. 5% versus 6. 3% for JEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Jefferies Financial Group Inc. 's 11. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Markel Corporation — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JEF: 31. 6% to $67. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) offers the highest yield at 8. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Loews Corporation (L).
09Is L or MKL or JEF or CNA or TRV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Travelers Companies, Inc.
(TRV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 4% yield, +201. 4% 10Y return). Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRV: +201. 4%, JEF: +300. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between L and MKL and JEF and CNA and TRV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: L is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JEF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CNA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MKL, JEF, CNA, TRV pay a dividend while L does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.