Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LC vs HOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
LC vs HOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $1.96B | $71.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $4.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $136M | $1.90B |
| Gross Margin | 64.7% | 83.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 41.9x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $15.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $918M | $4.26B |
LC vs HOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LC vs HOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.36
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
HOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 31.4%
- 127.0% 10Y total return vs LC's -51.9%
- 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs LC's 15.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 41.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.36 vs HOOD's 3.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.6% vs HOOD's +62.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs LC's 0.4% |
LC vs HOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LC vs HOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.5B annually — 3.4x LC's $1.3B. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LC's 10.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $4.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $287M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $136M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.9B | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.7% | +83.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +42.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, LC trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOOD's 38.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LC's 2.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOOD's 37.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $71.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $82.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.83x | 38.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.77x | 41.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.68x | 37.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | 15.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 7.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOOD delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for LC. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOOD's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LC scores 6/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$902M | $11.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $918M | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 97.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $22,702 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,082 for LC. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +70.6% total return vs HOOD's +62.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 107.0% vs LC's 35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | -31.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.6% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.3% | +787.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.8% | +127.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +127.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.4% | +107.0% |
Risk & Volatility
LC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LC is the less volatile stock with a 2.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOOD's 3.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LC currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HOOD's 51.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 3.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.67 | $153.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.70 | $45.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.7% | +51.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 29.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LC as "Buy" and HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.2% upside for HOOD (target: $117) vs 33.4% for LC (target: $23).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.75 | $117.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
LC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOOD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
LC vs HOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LC or HOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). LendingClub Corporation (LC) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LendingClub Corporation (LC) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LC or HOOD?
On trailing P/E, LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the cheapest at 14.
8x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, LendingClub Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LC or HOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) delivered a total return of +127. 0%, compared to +20. 8% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +127. 0% versus LC's -51. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LC or HOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
36β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 29% more volatile than LC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LC or HOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 15. 0% for LendingClub Corporation (LC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 31. 4% for Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LC or HOOD?
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 10. 2% for LendingClub Corporation — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus 25. 0% for LC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LC or HOOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LendingClub Corporation (LC) trades at 9.
8x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 32. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOOD: 48. 2% to $117. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — LC or HOOD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LC or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+127. 0% 10Y return). LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOOD: +127. 0%, LC: -51. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LC and HOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.