Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • TW
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-28.5%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$64.50B
5Y Perf.+1132.2%
AAOI
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.76B
5Y Perf.+1586.7%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.43B
5Y Perf.-32.8%

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LEDS logoLEDS
LITE logoLITE
AAOI logoAAOI
OLED logoOLED
IPGP logoIPGP
IndustrySemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$17M$64.50B$11.76B$4.32B$4.43B
Revenue (TTM)$44M$2.49B$507M$627M$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$440M$-43M$214M$29M
Gross Margin4.9%37.7%29.6%73.5%37.6%
Operating Margin-4.5%9.5%-11.6%35.6%0.3%
Forward P/E110.1x159.3x21.7x78.1x
Total Debt$4M$2.61B$167M$43M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$3M$521M$216M$138M$404M

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LEDS
LITE
AAOI
OLED
IPGP
StockMay 20May 26Return
SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS)10071.5-28.5%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001232.2+1132.2%
Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI)1001686.7+1586.7%
Universal Display C… (OLED)10062.6-37.4%
IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP)10067.2-32.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OLED leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SemiLEDs Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. LITE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation
The Growth Play

LEDS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 53.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.7%
  • 7.3% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5%
Best for: growth exposure
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 36.8% 10Y total return vs AAOI's 13.5%
  • +12.8% vs OLED's -34.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
AAOI
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
The Growth Angle

AAOI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
The Income Pick

OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 2.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Beta 1.33, yield 2.0%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Lower P/E (21.7x vs 78.1x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IPGP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLEDS logoLEDS7.3% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5%
ValueOLED logoOLEDLower P/E (21.7x vs 78.1x)
Quality / MarginsOLED logoOLED34.1% margin vs AAOI's -8.5%
Stability / SafetyOLED logoOLEDBeta 1.33 vs AAOI's 4.10, lower leverage
DividendsOLED logoOLED2.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LITE logoLITE+12.8% vs OLED's -34.2%
Efficiency (ROA)OLED logoOLED11.0% ROA vs LEDS's -9.3%, ROIC 11.7% vs -24.9%

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LEDSSemiLEDs Corporation
FY 2025
Other Products
94.3%$41M
L E D Components
4.8%$2M
Lighting Products
0.5%$228,000
L E D Chips
0.3%$149,000
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M
AAOIApplied Optoelectronics, Inc.
FY 2025
CATV
53.9%$245M
Data Center
43.0%$196M
Telecom
3.0%$14M
OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
FY 2025
Material Sales
54.3%$353M
Royalty And License Fees
42.3%$275M
Contract Research Services
3.5%$23M
IPGPIPG Photonics Corporation
FY 2025
High Power Continuous Wave CW Lasers
41.8%$309M
Laser And Non-Laser Systems
19.9%$147M
Pulsed Lasers
19.4%$143M
Medium And Low Power CW Lasers
11.9%$88M
Quasi-Continuous Wave QCW Lasers
7.0%$52M

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOLEDLAGGINGIPGP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 56.2x LEDS's $44M. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAOI's -8.5%. On growth, LEDS holds the edge at +103.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$44M$2.5B$507M$627M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$425M-$37M$259M$55M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$440M-$43M$214M$29M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$399M-$239M$237M$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.9%+37.7%+29.6%+73.5%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.5%+9.5%-11.6%+35.6%+0.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.0%+17.7%-8.5%+34.1%+2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+16.0%-47.1%+37.8%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+103.7%+90.1%+51.4%-14.5%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.7%+3.3%-5.6%-43.7%-54.4%
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LEDS and OLED each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.1x trailing earnings, OLED trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2441.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OLED's 14.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 869.4x.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Market CapShares × price$17M$64.5B$11.8B$4.3B$4.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$19M$66.6B$11.7B$4.2B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-13.87x2441.70x-232.72x18.06x143.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.110.06x159.35x21.66x78.05x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple869.35x14.21x50.42x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x39.21x25.80x6.64x4.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.78x55.41x12.21x2.48x2.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.41x27.99x
Evenly matched — LEDS and OLED each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-64 for LEDS. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs OLED's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-64.0%+30.7%-6.1%+12.3%+1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.3%+8.5%-3.8%+11.0%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-24.9%-4.3%-7.9%+11.7%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.3%-4.8%-8.5%+14.0%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967446
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.44x2.30x0.23x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1M$2.1B-$49M-$95M-$404M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$521M$216M$138M$404M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$2.6B$167M$43M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.59x9.62x-38.76x
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $197,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for LEDS. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs OLED's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.4% vs OLED's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.4%+134.0%+276.1%-24.3%+39.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.7%+1275.9%+909.1%-34.2%+77.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.2%+1786.5%+8314.7%-30.6%-10.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.1%+1018.5%+1878.0%-51.7%-44.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+12.4%+3680.0%+1351.7%+84.8%+23.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.1%+166.2%+3.4%-11.5%-3.5%
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.05x2.66x4.10x1.33x1.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.37$1021.00$191.87$163.21$155.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.01$63.98$12.56$83.64$58.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.7%+88.5%+77.6%+56.2%+67.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.253.354.044.939.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded24K6.5M12.7M823K504K
Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LITE as "Buy", AAOI as "Buy", OLED as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.7% upside for OLED (target: $141) vs -50.0% for AAOI (target: $75). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…IPGP logoIPGPIPG Photonics Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$918.67$74.50$141.00$141.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts25161927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises091
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%+0.8%+1.2%
OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OLED leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallUniversal Display Corporati… (OLED)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LEDS vs LITE vs AAOI vs OLED vs IPGP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the stronger pick with 729.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

On trailing P/E, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the cheapest at 18.

1x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2441. 7x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1878%, compared to -76. 1% for SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus LEDS's +12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

33β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 10β — meaning AAOI is approximately 208% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is pulling ahead at 729.

8% versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 2% for Universal Display Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

2% net margin versus -8. 4% for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -12. 0% for AAOI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 21.

7x forward P/E versus 159. 3x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 137. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLED: 53. 7% to $141. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP?

In this comparison, OLED (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. LEDS, LITE, AAOI, IPGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LEDS or LITE or AAOI or OLED or IPGP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

0% yield). SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +84. 8%, LEDS: +12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LEDS and LITE and AAOI and OLED and IPGP?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LEDS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED pays a dividend while LEDS, LITE, AAOI, IPGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LEDS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAOI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OLED

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IPGP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LEDS and LITE and AAOI and OLED and IPGP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LEDS: 103.7% · LITE: 90.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.