Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • TW
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-30.2%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.74B
5Y Perf.+1117.7%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%
AAOI
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.44B
5Y Perf.+1684.3%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.37B
5Y Perf.-36.7%

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LEDS logoLEDS
LITE logoLITE
COHU logoCOHU
AAOI logoAAOI
OLED logoOLED
IndustrySemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$17M$63.74B$2.23B$12.44B$4.37B
Revenue (TTM)$44M$2.49B$481M$507M$627M
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$440M$-56M$-43M$214M
Gross Margin4.9%37.7%25.7%29.6%73.5%
Operating Margin-4.5%9.5%-10.6%-11.6%35.6%
Forward P/E114.4x89.2x167.2x19.4x
Total Debt$4M$2.61B$359M$167M$43M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$521M$227M$216M$138M

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLEDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LEDS
LITE
COHU
AAOI
OLED
StockMay 20May 26Return
SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS)10069.8-30.2%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001217.7+1117.7%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100315.3+215.3%
Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI)1001784.3+1684.3%
Universal Display C… (OLED)10063.3-36.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OLED leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SemiLEDs Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. LITE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LEDS
SemiLEDs Corporation
The Growth Play

LEDS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 53.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.7%
  • 7.3% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5%
Best for: growth exposure
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 36.4% 10Y total return vs AAOI's 14.4%
  • +12.5% vs OLED's -34.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Technology Pick

COHU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
AAOI
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, AAOI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
The Income Pick

OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 1.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Beta 1.39, yield 1.9%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Lower P/E (19.4x vs 167.2x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLEDS logoLEDS7.3% revenue growth vs OLED's 0.5%
ValueOLED logoOLEDLower P/E (19.4x vs 167.2x)
Quality / MarginsOLED logoOLED34.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Stability / SafetyOLED logoOLEDBeta 1.39 vs AAOI's 4.13, lower leverage
DividendsOLED logoOLED1.9% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LITE logoLITE+12.5% vs OLED's -34.0%
Efficiency (ROA)OLED logoOLED11.0% ROA vs LEDS's -9.3%, ROIC 11.7% vs -24.9%

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LEDSSemiLEDs Corporation
FY 2025
Other Products
94.3%$41M
L E D Components
4.8%$2M
Lighting Products
0.5%$228,000
L E D Chips
0.3%$149,000
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M
AAOIApplied Optoelectronics, Inc.
FY 2025
CATV
53.9%$245M
Data Center
43.0%$196M
Telecom
3.0%$14M
OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
FY 2025
Material Sales
54.3%$353M
Royalty And License Fees
42.3%$275M
Contract Research Services
3.5%$23M

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOLEDLAGGINGCOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 56.2x LEDS's $44M. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, LEDS holds the edge at +103.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$44M$2.5B$481M$507M$627M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$425M-$11M-$37M$259M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$440M-$56M-$43M$214M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$399M$32M-$239M$237M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.9%+37.7%+25.7%+29.6%+73.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.5%+9.5%-10.6%-11.6%+35.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.0%+17.7%-11.5%-8.5%+34.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.1%+16.0%+6.6%-47.1%+37.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+103.7%+90.1%+29.3%+51.4%-14.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.7%+3.3%+60.6%-5.6%-43.7%
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OLED leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.3x trailing earnings, OLED trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OLED's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Market CapShares × price$17M$63.7B$2.2B$12.4B$4.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18M$65.8B$2.4B$12.4B$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-13.53x2412.94x-29.86x-246.17x18.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.114.43x89.21x167.16x19.43x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.44x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple859.43x14.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.39x38.75x4.93x27.29x6.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.64x54.76x2.82x12.92x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.16x207.83x28.30x
OLED leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-64 for LEDS. OLED carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs OLED's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-64.0%+30.7%-6.8%-6.1%+12.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.3%+8.5%-4.9%-3.8%+11.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-24.9%-4.3%-5.7%-7.9%+11.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.3%-4.8%-5.9%-8.5%+14.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.44x2.30x0.46x0.23x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1M$2.1B$132M-$49M-$95M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$521M$227M$216M$138M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$2.6B$359M$167M$43M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.59x9.62x-168.82x-28.36x
OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,553 for LEDS. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs OLED's -34.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs OLED's -11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.3%+131.2%+92.9%+297.9%-23.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.0%+1247.8%+199.7%+1027.0%-34.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+0.7%+1764.2%+40.7%+8801.1%-29.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.5%+976.6%+22.2%+1978.5%-54.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.7%+3635.5%+330.2%+1435.6%+86.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.2%+165.2%+12.1%+3.5%-11.1%
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — COHU and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 56.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.91x2.69x2.13x4.13x1.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.37$1021.00$50.68$191.87$163.21
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.01$60.38$15.34$12.56$83.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.2%+87.4%+93.7%+82.1%+56.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.558.875.562.946.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded23K6.4M953K12.4M817K
Evenly matched — COHU and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LITE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", AAOI as "Buy", OLED as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.0% upside for OLED (target: $141) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLEDS logoLEDSSemiLEDs Corporat…LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.AAOI logoAAOIApplied Optoelect…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$643.18$49.75$46.00$141.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts24141619
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises009
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.3%0.0%+0.8%
OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OLED leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallUniversal Display Corporati… (OLED)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LEDS vs LITE vs COHU vs AAOI vs OLED: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the stronger pick with 729.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

On trailing P/E, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the cheapest at 18.

3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to -74. 5% for SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus LEDS's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

39β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 198% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is pulling ahead at 729.

8% versus 0. 5% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

2% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 19.

4x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 147. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLED: 52. 0% to $141. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED?

In this comparison, OLED (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. LEDS, LITE, COHU, AAOI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LEDS or LITE or COHU or AAOI or OLED better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

9% yield). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +86. 6%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LEDS and LITE and COHU and AAOI and OLED?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LEDS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED pays a dividend while LEDS, LITE, COHU, AAOI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LEDS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAOI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OLED

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LEDS and LITE and COHU and AAOI and OLED on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LEDS: 103.7% · LITE: 90.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.