REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Mortgage
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $61M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $1.43B | $260M | $-20M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | 76.1% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 44.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 79.6x | 119.0x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21.38B | $13.22B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $5.03B | $741M | $29M |
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lument Finance Trus… (LFT) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 423.6 | +323.6% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 249.7 | +149.7% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 30.2%
- 30.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs ACRE's 0.99, lower leverage
ACRE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 119.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs LFT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 119.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs ACRE's -36.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs ACRE's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 30.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs LFT's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs ACRE's -1.3%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.9% |
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACRE leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • LFT leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 212.6x ACRE's $55M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACRE's -36.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $1.4B | $260M | -$20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $2.5B | $1.4B | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.4% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +44.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -36.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +21.9% | +22.4% | -80.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +22.5% | 0.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ACRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 153.3x trailing earnings, WELL trades at a 4% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACRE's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $165.6B | $53.6B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.29x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -307.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 79.65x | 119.03x | 16.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 66.40x | 24.31x | 18.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.99x | 7.05x | 3.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.28x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.02x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 14.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ACRE. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACRE's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs LFT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +0.6% | +3.2% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 1.05x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $5.0B | $741M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21.4B | $13.2B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.26x | 1.40x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,981 for LFT. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs LFT's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs ACRE's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.4% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.4% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +189.5% | +94.2% | -4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.2% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +43.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | +42.5% | +24.8% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACRE's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs LFT's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.15x | -0.01x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.68 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $5.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $4.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.9 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
LFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", ACRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WELL (target: $233) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, LFT offers the higher dividend yield at 30.16% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $233.25 | $93.91 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 32 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +30.2% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +14.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACRE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LFT vs WELL vs VTR vs ACRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 153. 3x trailing P/E (79. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
On trailing P/E, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the cheapest at 153. 3x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -30. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +225. 2% versus LFT's -0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation's 0. 96β — meaning ACRE is approximately -8451% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 2% for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -100. 0% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -141. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -12. 2% for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFT leads at 76. 1% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFT leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) trades at 16.
6x forward P/E versus 119. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 102. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 9. 5% to $233. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) offers the highest yield at 30. 2%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is LFT or WELL or VTR or ACRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +66. 1%, ACRE: +44. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LFT and WELL and VTR and ACRE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.