Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Waste Management
Information Technology Services
Waste Management
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Construction Materials | Waste Management | Information Technology Services | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $3M | $356K | $207M | $25M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.54B | $9M | $59M | $299M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $117M | $-25M | $-18M | $-4M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 14.0% | 4.1% | 22.8% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | -237.8% | -26.3% | -1.4% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.6x | — | — | — | 63.9x |
| Total Debt | $68M | $110K | $4M | $34M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $671K | $12M | $28M | $124M |
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas GC Limited Or… (LGCL) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 93.9 | -6.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 88.0 | -12.0% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (0.6x vs 63.9x)
- 4.6% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
- 29.1% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -14.5%
Among these 5 stocks, RETO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +26.2% vs RETO's -95.9%
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85
CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.6x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.2% vs RETO's -95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.1% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -14.5% |
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PESI leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • RETO leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LGCL and RETO and CWST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 293.0x RETO's $9M. LGCL is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $9M | $59M | $299M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $109M | -$19M | -$14M | -$1M | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $117M | -$25M | -$18M | -$4M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | -$7M | -$14M | $0 | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +14.0% | +4.1% | +22.8% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | -2.4% | -26.3% | -1.4% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | -2.9% | -30.1% | -1.3% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | -77.8% | -23.4% | -2.3% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.0% | +49.0% | -20.1% | +15.3% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -158.1% | +98.8% | -110.5% | +75.8% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LGCL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.6x trailing earnings, LGCL trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LGCL's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $355,799 | $207M | $25M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | -$205,956 | $200M | $31M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.60x | -0.04x | -14.89x | -3.48x | 712.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 63.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.67x | — | — | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.19x | 3.36x | 0.15x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 0.01x | 4.11x | 0.43x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 63.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGCL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LGCL delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RETO scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.2% | -183.4% | -34.5% | -6.1% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +29.1% | -75.1% | -20.2% | -3.2% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | -14.5% | -21.7% | -7.9% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | -21.6% | -16.7% | -9.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.00x | 0.09x | 0.59x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | -$561,755 | -$7M | $6M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $671,355 | $12M | $28M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $68M | $109,600 | $4M | $34M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.95x | -31.78x | -42.14x | — | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +26.2% total return vs RETO's -95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | -66.1% | -8.8% | -10.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.3% | -95.9% | +26.2% | -5.4% | -28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -99.9% | +21.7% | +0.5% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -100.0% | +45.6% | -69.3% | +25.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -100.0% | +178.6% | -78.5% | +1059.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.9% | -92.0% | +6.8% | +0.2% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs RETO's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.77x | 1.85x | 0.27x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.80 | $19.55 | $16.50 | $1.88 | $121.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $0.48 | $8.02 | $0.80 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +3.3% | +67.7% | +48.2% | +70.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 43.5 | 41.5 | 49.8 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 920K | 164K | 15K | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | — | $119.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LGCL vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Lucas GC Limited Ordinary Shares (LGCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
On trailing P/E, Lucas GC Limited Ordinary Shares (LGCL) is the cheapest at 0.
6x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 579% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
Lucas GC Limited Ordinary Shares (LGCL) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
7% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LGCL, RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGCL or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGCL and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (LGCL (Technology) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LGCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while LGCL, RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.