Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Consumer Electronics
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $139M | $4.33T | $2.90T | $1.44T | $4.27T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $422.57B | $318.27B | $214.96B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $160.21B | $125.22B | $70.59B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 46.7% | 60.4% | 68.3% | 81.9% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 32.7% | 46.8% | 41.2% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 25.2x | 23.3x | 17.2x | 33.3x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $59.29B | $112.18B | $83.90B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $30.71B | $30.24B | $35.87B | $35.93B |
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Education In… (LGCY) | 100 | 239.3 | +139.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 90.8 | -9.2% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 124.9 | +24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.5%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- 39.5% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 33.3x)
GOOG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs AAPL's 11.3%
- PEG 0.84 vs AAPL's 1.86
- +102.9% vs META's -17.9%
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs LGCY's 10.9%
Among these 5 stocks, META doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 34.0% ROA vs LGCY's 11.7%, ROIC 67.4% vs 27.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.5% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 33.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs LGCY's 10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs META's 1.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.9% vs META's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs LGCY's 11.7%, ROIC 67.4% vs 27.1% |
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGCY leads in 1 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 1 • GOOG leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • META leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MSFT and META each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 5794.8x LGCY's $78M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGCY's 10.9%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $422.6B | $318.3B | $215.0B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $161.3B | $192.6B | $109.3B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $160.2B | $125.2B | $70.6B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $73.3B | $72.9B | $48.3B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +60.4% | +68.3% | +81.9% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +32.7% | +46.8% | +41.2% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +37.9% | +39.3% | +32.8% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +17.3% | +22.9% | +22.4% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.8% | +18.3% | +33.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +81.9% | +23.4% | +62.4% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LGCY leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, LGCY trades at a 52% valuation discount to AAPL's 39.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOG offers better value at 1.11x vs AAPL's 2.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $4.33T | $2.90T | $1.44T | $4.27T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $4.36T | $2.98T | $1.48T | $4.35T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.66x | 33.13x | 28.65x | 24.14x | 39.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 25.19x | 23.25x | 17.23x | 33.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x | 1.52x | 1.31x | 2.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.10x | 29.02x | 18.35x | 14.57x | 30.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 10.75x | 10.30x | 7.15x | 10.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.40x | 10.55x | 8.49x | 6.72x | 59.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.12x | 59.14x | 40.53x | 31.16x | 43.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $19 for LGCY. GOOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.8% | +39.0% | +33.1% | +33.2% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +27.4% | +19.2% | +20.8% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.1% | +25.1% | +24.9% | +27.6% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.9% | +30.3% | +29.7% | +29.4% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.14x | 0.33x | 0.39x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $28.6B | $81.9B | $48.0B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $30.7B | $30.2B | $35.9B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $59.3B | $112.2B | $83.9B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 136.29x | 392.15x | 55.65x | 78.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $28,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,605 for MSFT. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +102.9% total return vs META's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 42.5% vs MSFT's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +13.7% | -17.0% | -12.7% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | +102.9% | -17.7% | -17.9% | +46.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +189.5% | +20.7% | +110.9% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +184.9% | +56.0% | +69.7% | +126.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +902.3% | +727.4% | +401.6% | +1130.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +42.5% | +6.5% | +28.2% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSFT and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs MSFT's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.29x | 0.84x | 1.45x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $404.44 | $555.45 | $796.25 | $317.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.94 | $163.33 | $356.28 | $520.26 | $195.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +88.6% | +70.3% | +71.2% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 42.1 | 36.8 | 35.0 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 18.8M | 33.7M | 15.7M | 43.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGCY as "Buy", GOOG as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", META as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for META (target: $826) vs 11.9% for GOOG (target: $401). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.83% vs GOOG's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $400.72 | $551.96 | $826.11 | $326.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 79 | 82 | 60 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.8% | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 21 | 2 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $3.23 | $2.07 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +1.8% | +2.1% |
LGCY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AAPL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LGCY vs GOOG vs MSFT vs META vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the stronger pick with 39. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus Apple Inc. at 39. 0x. On forward P/E, Legacy Education Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) delivered a total return of +184. 9%, compared to +56. 0% for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1131% versus LGCY's +173. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning META is approximately 74% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is pulling ahead at 39. 5% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGCY leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 11. 7% for Legacy Education Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 15. 6% for LGCY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 3x for Apple Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 45. 7% to $826. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), META (0. 4% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GOOG (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LGCY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGCY or GOOG or MSFT or META or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 0. 8% yield, +727. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +727. 4%, LGCY: +173. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGCY and GOOG and MSFT and META and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (LGCY (Consumer Defensive) and GOOG (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology) and META (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LGCY is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOG is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while LGCY, GOOG, META, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.