Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Construction
Construction
Construction
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Conglomerates | Construction | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.56B | $138.48B | $54.77B | $86.05B | $103.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $36.76B | $21.87B | $24.43B | $21.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $4.10B | $1.32B | $3.53B | $2.90B |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 36.9% | 24.8% | 36.6% | 35.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 14.9% | 8.1% | 13.6% | 18.2% |
| Forward P/E | 97.9x | 20.8x | 23.5x | 29.1x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.70B | $34.58B | $12.67B | $11.19B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $12.49B | $1.55B | $379M | $1.76B |
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honeywell Internati… (HON) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| Carrier Global Corp… (CARR) | 100 | 320.3 | +220.3% |
| Johnson Controls In… (JCI) | 100 | 449.0 | +349.0% |
| Trane Technologies … (TT) | 100 | 518.4 | +418.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.9%, EPS growth 121.2%
- 29.9% revenue growth vs CARR's -3.3%
- 3.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HON's 2.1%
- +220.2% vs CARR's -9.5%
HON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 29.1x)
Among these 5 stocks, CARR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 14.5% margin vs LGN's 0.5%
TT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs LGN's 220.2%
- PEG 1.05 vs HON's 11.31
- 13.4% ROA vs LGN's 0.4%, ROIC 26.2% vs 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.9% revenue growth vs CARR's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 29.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs LGN's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs LGN's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HON's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.2% vs CARR's -9.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs LGN's 0.4%, ROIC 26.2% vs 3.3% |
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JCI leads in 1 of 6 categories
HON leads 1 • TT leads 1 • LGN leads 1 • CARR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HON is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.8B annually — 17.5x LGN's $2.1B. JCI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LGN's 0.5%. On growth, JCI holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $36.8B | $21.9B | $24.4B | $21.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $6.5B | $3.1B | $3.9B | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $4.1B | $1.3B | $3.5B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $4.2B | $1.7B | $1.4B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +36.9% | +24.8% | +36.6% | +35.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +14.9% | +8.1% | +13.6% | +18.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.2% | +6.0% | +14.5% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.4% | +7.6% | +5.7% | +14.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.9% | +2.4% | +8.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -41.9% | -40.4% | +38.9% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.7x trailing earnings, HON trades at a 97% valuation discount to LGN's 1022.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TT offers better value at 1.21x vs HON's 16.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $138.5B | $54.8B | $86.1B | $103.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $160.6B | $65.9B | $96.9B | $106.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1022.62x | 29.69x | 38.56x | 53.63x | 36.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 97.94x | 20.76x | 23.49x | 29.08x | 31.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 16.17x | — | 2.09x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.51x | 20.18x | 21.29x | 26.23x | 25.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 3.70x | 2.52x | 3.65x | 4.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.10x | 3.93x | 7.12x | 12.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 444.33x | 25.68x | 32.28x | 89.17x | 36.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TT delivers a 34.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $9 for CARR. TT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HON's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TT scores 9/9 vs CARR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.1% | +9.1% | +24.9% | +34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +5.3% | +3.5% | +9.0% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +12.6% | +6.7% | +8.5% | +26.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +12.6% | +7.2% | +9.8% | +27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.24x | 0.90x | 0.86x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $22.1B | $11.1B | $10.8B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $12.5B | $1.6B | $379M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $34.6B | $12.7B | $11.2B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.29x | 3.92x | 5.76x | 18.41x | 17.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGN five years ago would be worth $32,020 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,849 for HON. Over the past 12 months, LGN leads with a +220.2% total return vs CARR's -9.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGN at 47.4% vs HON's 6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +118.6% | +12.2% | +23.4% | +15.6% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +220.2% | +1.7% | -9.5% | +49.7% | +13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.2% | +19.0% | +60.5% | +134.7% | +169.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.2% | +8.5% | +63.3% | +135.0% | +170.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +220.2% | +135.3% | +480.7% | +336.5% | +860.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.4% | +6.0% | +17.1% | +32.9% | +39.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HON and JCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HON is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGN's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JCI currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs CARR's 80.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.52x | 0.74x | 1.21x | 0.95x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.64 | $248.18 | $81.09 | $147.32 | $503.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.96 | $186.76 | $50.24 | $94.35 | $348.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +88.1% | +80.8% | +95.7% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.5 | 49.2 | 57.8 | 52.9 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 3.7M | 6.6M | 3.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LGN and HON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGN as "Buy", HON as "Buy", CARR as "Buy", JCI as "Buy", TT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.8% upside for TT (target: $523) vs -24.5% for LGN (target: $74). For income investors, LGN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.03% vs TT's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.75 | $243.83 | $67.50 | $143.14 | $522.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 28 | 26 | 45 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +2.1% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.96 | $4.63 | $0.91 | $1.49 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +5.3% | +7.0% | +1.4% |
JCI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LGN vs HON vs CARR vs JCI vs TT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is the stronger pick with 29. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Honeywell International Inc. (HON) offers the better valuation at 29. 7x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
On trailing P/E, Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the cheapest at 29. 7x versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock at 1022. 6x. On forward P/E, Honeywell International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trane Technologies plc wins at 1. 05x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
Over the past 5 years, Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) delivered a total return of +220. 2%, compared to +8. 5% for Honeywell International Inc. (HON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TT returned +860. 7% versus HON's +135. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honeywell International Inc.
(HON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Legence Corp. Class A Common stock's 2. 52β — meaning LGN is approximately 240% more volatile than HON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trane Technologies plc (TT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 2% for Honeywell International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legence Corp.
Class A Common stock (LGN) is pulling ahead at 29. 9% versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legence Corp. Class A Common stock grew EPS 121. 2% year-over-year, compared to -72. 4% for Carrier Global Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TT leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
Johnson Controls International plc (JCI) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus 0. 5% for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TT leads at 18. 6% versus 2. 8% for LGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HON leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus Honeywell International Inc. 's 11. 31x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Honeywell International Inc. (HON) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 97. 9x for Legence Corp. Class A Common stock — 77. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TT: 11. 8% to $522. 73.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Trane Technologies plc (TT).
09Is LGN or HON or CARR or JCI or TT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trane Technologies plc (TT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
98), 0. 8% yield, +860. 7% 10Y return). Legence Corp. Class A Common stock (LGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TT: +860. 7%, LGN: +220. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGN and HON and CARR and JCI and TT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CARR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JCI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.