Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LIF
Life360, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.49B
5Y Perf.+35.9%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.14T
5Y Perf.+71.2%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$213.51B
5Y Perf.+1.7%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+118.5%

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LIF logoLIF
NVDA logoNVDA
QCOM logoQCOM
GOOGL logoGOOGL
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSemiconductorsSemiconductorsInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$3.49B$5.14T$213.51B$4.81T
Revenue (TTM)$489M$215.94B$44.49B$422.57B
Net Income (TTM)$151M$120.07B$9.92B$160.21B
Gross Margin77.8%71.1%54.8%60.4%
Operating Margin3.8%60.4%25.5%32.7%
Forward P/E34.1x25.6x18.8x29.6x
Total Debt$310M$11.41B$16.37B$59.29B
Cash & Equiv.$494M$10.61B$7.84B$30.71B

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LIF
NVDA
QCOM
GOOGL
StockJun 24May 26Return
Life360, Inc. (LIF)100135.9+35.9%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)100171.2+71.2%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100101.7+1.7%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100218.5+118.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NVDA leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. QUALCOMM Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. GOOGL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LIF
Life360, Inc.
The Growth Angle

LIF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Growth Play

NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
  • 239.0% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
  • PEG 0.27 vs QCOM's 9.06
  • 65.5% revenue growth vs QCOM's 13.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Income Pick

QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
  • Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
  • Lower P/E (18.8x vs 29.6x)
  • 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GOOGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • Beta 1.26 vs LIF's 2.25, lower leverage
  • +163.5% vs LIF's -1.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVDA logoNVDA65.5% revenue growth vs QCOM's 13.7%
ValueQCOM logoQCOMLower P/E (18.8x vs 29.6x)
Quality / MarginsNVDA logoNVDA55.6% margin vs QCOM's 22.3%
Stability / SafetyGOOGL logoGOOGLBeta 1.26 vs LIF's 2.25, lower leverage
DividendsQCOM logoQCOM1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+163.5% vs LIF's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA logoNVDA58.1% ROA vs QCOM's 18.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs 29.1%

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LIFLife360, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
75.4%$369M
Product and Service, Other
14.0%$68M
Hardware
10.6%$52M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGLIF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 863.3x LIF's $489M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 22.3%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$489M$215.9B$44.5B$422.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$33M$133.2B$12.8B$161.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$151M$120.1B$9.9B$160.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$81M$96.7B$12.5B$73.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.8%+71.1%+54.8%+60.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.8%+60.4%+25.5%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.8%+55.6%+22.3%+37.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+44.8%+28.1%+17.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.4%+73.2%-3.5%+21.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+97.8%+173.0%+81.9%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 24.9x trailing earnings, LIF trades at a 42% valuation discount to NVDA's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.5B$5.14T$213.5B$4.81T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$5.14T$222.0B$4.84T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.86x43.16x40.43x36.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.14x25.55x18.84x29.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.45x19.44x1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple101.80x38.59x15.91x32.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.14x23.80x4.82x11.95x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.84x32.85x10.56x11.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.22x53.17x16.65x65.72x
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $36 for LIF. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.9%+76.3%+40.2%+39.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+20.4%+58.1%+18.4%+27.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+81.8%+29.1%+25.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.1%+97.2%+28.9%+30.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x0.07x0.77x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$184M$807M$8.5B$28.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$494M$10.6B$7.8B$30.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$310M$11.4B$16.4B$59.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense545.03x17.60x392.15x
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,852 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs LIF's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs QCOM's 25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.6%+12.0%+17.6%+26.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.9%+80.7%+42.9%+163.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+625.9%+96.4%+270.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1328.9%+58.5%+239.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+23902.3%+350.2%+996.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+93.6%+25.2%+54.8%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LIF's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.25x1.73x1.55x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$112.54$216.80$223.66$400.10
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$37.01$112.28$121.99$147.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+39.1%+97.6%+90.6%+99.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.360.780.183.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M164.5M15.1M28.3M
GOOGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LIF as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.3% upside for LIF (target: $74) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationQCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$74.05$278.83$175.00$406.28
# AnalystsCovering analysts10796982
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.7%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2232
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$3.44$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%+4.1%+0.9%
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LIF vs NVDA vs QCOM vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 7% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Life360, Inc. (LIF) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (34. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

On trailing P/E, Life360, Inc.

(LIF) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to +58.

5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus QCOM's +350. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Life360, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning LIF is approximately 78% more volatile than GOOGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.

5% versus 13. 7% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life360, Inc. grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus 12. 5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 3. 8% for LIF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIF leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 1x for Life360, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIF: 68. 3% to $74. 05.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL?

In this comparison, QCOM (1.

7% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LIF, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LIF or NVDA or QCOM or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LIF and NVDA and QCOM and GOOGL?

These companies operate in different sectors (LIF (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LIF is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. QCOM pays a dividend while LIF, NVDA, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LIF

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVDA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QCOM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LIF and NVDA and QCOM and GOOGL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LIF: 26.4% · NVDA: 73.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(LIF: 30.8% · NVDA: 55.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LIF: 24.9x · NVDA: 43.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.