Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $27K | $358.42B | $150.63B | $30.32B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $174K | $61.16B | $63.31B | $16.63B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.26B | $4.23B | $7.49B | $1.39B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | -15.4% | 70.2% | 69.3% | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7361.3% | 26.7% | 23.4% | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.3x | 8.9x | 14.1x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $48K | $69.07B | $67.42B | $16.17B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $5.23B | $1.14B | $1.98B | $214M |
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipella Pharmaceuti… (LIPO) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 22.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.4%
- 19.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 295.5% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Beta 0.34 vs LIPO's 1.77
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 77.7%, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.4x)
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 4.7% ROA vs LIPO's -53.5%
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.8% vs LIPO's -98.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs LIPO's -7.2K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs LIPO's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.8% vs LIPO's -98.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs LIPO's -53.5% |
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFE leads 1 • LIPO leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 364579.1x LIPO's $173,666. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIPO's -7244.7%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $173,666 | $61.2B | $63.3B | $16.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $24.5B | $21.0B | $3.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $4.2B | $7.5B | $1.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.4B | $18.7B | $9.5B | $2.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | +70.2% | +69.3% | +26.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7361.3% | +26.7% | +23.4% | +13.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7244.7% | +6.9% | +11.8% | +8.3% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13598.6% | +30.6% | +15.0% | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +10.0% | +5.4% | +8.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.3% | +57.4% | -9.5% | +15.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LIPO and PFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 77% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27,462 | $358.4B | $150.6B | $30.3B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $422.3B | $216.9B | $44.5B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 85.50x | 19.47x | 22.79x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.28x | 8.94x | 14.06x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.96x | 10.66x | 12.97x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 5.86x | 2.41x | 1.86x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | — | 1.74x | 4.67x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.12x | 16.60x | 14.78x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LIPO and ABBV each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-85 for LIPO. LIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.6% | +62.1% | +8.3% | +22.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.5% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +4.7% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.9% | +7.5% | +8.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -198.8% | +21.5% | +9.0% | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.78x | 2.44x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $63.8B | $66.3B | $14.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $5.2B | $1.1B | $2.0B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47,605 | $69.1B | $67.4B | $16.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x | 4.02x | 3.10x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for LIPO. Over the past 12 months, CRL leads with a +32.8% total return vs LIPO's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs LIPO's -88.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -84.7% | -10.1% | +6.9% | -20.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.9% | +11.3% | +23.7% | +16.5% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +50.4% | -18.4% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +101.3% | -13.3% | -23.8% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +295.5% | +29.6% | +166.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -88.0% | +14.6% | -6.6% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABBV and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIPO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs LIPO's 0.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.34x | 0.54x | 1.33x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.17 | $244.81 | $28.75 | $247.05 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $176.57 | $21.97 | $134.65 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.8% | +82.8% | +92.1% | +72.3% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 46.8 | 44.2 | 58.5 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 5.8M | 33.3M | 1.6M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABBV as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for ABBV (target: $257) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs ABBV's 3.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $256.64 | $27.27 | $225.63 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 | 39 | 44 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +6.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 15 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 | $1.72 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.0% |
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PFE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
LIPO vs ABBV vs PFE vs IQV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(LIPO) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -99. 5% for Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus LIPO's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning LIPO is approximately 423% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(LIPO) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 22. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIPO leads at 27. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -935. 2% for Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -947. 2% for LIPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFE leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 26. 6% to $256. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), ABBV (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LIPO, IQV, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LIPO or ABBV or PFE or IQV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Lipella Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LIPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, LIPO: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIPO and ABBV and PFE and IQV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV, PFE pay a dividend while LIPO, IQV, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.