Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Specialty Retail
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $23M | $1.80B | $2.60B | $59M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $219M | $2.48B | $9.50B | $548M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $100M | $-568M | $-50M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 34.6% | 22.7% | 32.8% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 7.3% | 9.0% | -8.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.6x | 34.7x | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $410M | $18.45B | $25M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $142M | $2.04B | $26M | $40M |
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LightInTheBox Holdi… (LITB) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
| Globant S.A. (GLOB) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LITB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.45 vs VNET's 2.70
- +101.6% vs GLOB's -66.7%
- 8.1% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%
GLOB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.60
- Rev growth 15.3%, EPS growth 2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.0%
- 15.3% revenue growth vs LITB's -59.4%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.9x)
VNET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRTS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.28, current ratio 1.66x
FLXS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs GLOB's 13.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.78x
- 4.8% margin vs PRTS's -9.2%
- 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.3% revenue growth vs LITB's -59.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs PRTS's -9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs VNET's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.6% vs GLOB's -66.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5% |
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLOB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 1 • LITB leads 0 • VNET leads 0 • PRTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LITB and VNET each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNET is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 43.3x LITB's $219M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTS's -9.2%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $219M | $2.5B | $9.5B | $548M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $321M | $2.8B | -$33M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $100M | -$568M | -$50M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $231M | -$3.9B | -$52M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +34.6% | +22.7% | +32.8% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +7.3% | +9.0% | -8.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +4.0% | -6.0% | -9.2% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.8% | +9.3% | -40.7% | -9.4% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +0.4% | +23.8% | -9.8% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | -28.4% | -2.1% | +55.2% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GLOB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, GLOB trades at a 88% valuation discount to VNET's 92.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLOB's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VNET's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $1.8B | $2.6B | $59M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $2.1B | $5.0B | $59M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.07x | 11.01x | 92.39x | -1.03x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.57x | 34.74x | — | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.52x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.34x | 15.40x | — | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.75x | 2.14x | 0.11x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.90x | 2.56x | 0.97x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.17x | — | — | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LITB and FLXS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PRTS. GLOB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LITB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +4.4% | -7.6% | -79.8% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +3.0% | -1.5% | -25.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +8.3% | +2.4% | -51.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.6% | +3.2% | -43.7% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.20x | 2.67x | 0.47x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $268M | $16.4B | -$660,000 | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $142M | $2.0B | $26M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $410M | $18.4B | $25M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 406.59x | 4.74x | 1.75x | -49.49x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $564 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, LITB leads with a +101.6% total return vs GLOB's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs PRTS's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.2% | -35.0% | -1.6% | +69.5% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +101.6% | -66.7% | +42.2% | +3.4% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | -70.9% | +199.7% | -81.6% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | -81.2% | -65.1% | -94.4% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.4% | +13.6% | -36.8% | -73.7% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | -33.8% | +44.2% | -43.1% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LITB and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LITB is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs GLOB's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 1.60x | 2.70x | 1.28x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $142.25 | $14.48 | $1.36 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $38.49 | $5.15 | $0.39 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.9% | +28.8% | +61.9% | +62.3% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 36.1 | 53.0 | 55.3 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 1.3M | 5.7M | 662K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
GLOB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LITB as "Hold", GLOB as "Buy", VNET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.8% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $63.83 | $23.55 | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 28 | 16 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
GLOB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FLXS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
LITB vs GLOB vs VNET vs PRTS vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -59. 4% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. (LITB). Globant S. A. (GLOB) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Globant S. A. (GLOB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 92. 4x. On forward P/E, Globant S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -94. 4% for CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus LITB's -83. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LightInTheBox Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LITB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately 496% more volatile than LITB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globant S. A. (GLOB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -59. 4% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd. (LITB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VNET Group, Inc. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for LightInTheBox Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLOB leads at 23. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
Globant S.
A. (GLOB) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -9. 2% for CarParts. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLOB leads at 9. 3% versus -8. 9% for PRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LITB leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Globant S.
A. (GLOB) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for VNET Group, Inc. — 28. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 162. 8% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LITB, GLOB, VNET, PRTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LITB or GLOB or VNET or PRTS or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LightInTheBox Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LITB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LITB: -83. 4%, VNET: -36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LITB and GLOB and VNET and PRTS and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LITB (Consumer Cyclical) and GLOB (Technology) and VNET (Technology) and PRTS (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LITB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLOB is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while LITB, GLOB, VNET, PRTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.