Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Home Improvement
Home Improvement
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Home Improvement | Home Improvement | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $40M | $320.71B | $129.29B | $5.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $442M | $164.68B | $86.29B | $4.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $14.16B | $6.65B | $199M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 33.3% | 33.5% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 12.7% | 11.8% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 2.7x | 21.5x | 18.3x | 26.1x |
| Total Debt | $216M | $19.01B | $7.19B | $3.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1.39B | $982M | $249M |
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 99.1 | -0.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIVE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.27 vs FND's 30.50
- Lower P/E (2.7x vs 26.1x), PEG 0.27 vs 30.50
HD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 0.84, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.06x
- 8.6% margin vs FND's 4.3%
LOW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 244.9% 10Y total return vs HD's 184.0%
- +5.4% vs FND's -29.8%
FND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 1.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.7x vs 26.1x), PEG 0.27 vs 30.50 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs FND's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs FND's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs LOW's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs FND's -29.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 32.1% vs 4.4% |
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOW leads in 2 of 6 categories
LIVE leads 1 • HD leads 1 • FND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HD is the larger business by revenue, generating $164.7B annually — 372.6x LIVE's $442M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.6% (HD) to 4.3% (FND). On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $164.7B | $86.3B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $24.2B | $12.3B | $443M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $14.2B | $6.7B | $199M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $12.6B | $7.7B | $105M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +33.3% | +33.5% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +12.7% | +11.8% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +8.6% | +7.7% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | -3.8% | +10.9% | -0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | -14.6% | -11.0% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LIVE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 90% valuation discount to FND's 26.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIVE offers better value at 0.27x vs FND's 30.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $320.7B | $129.3B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $248M | $338.3B | $135.5B | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.67x | 22.67x | 19.48x | 26.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.47x | 18.34x | 26.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.27x | 6.35x | 2.20x | 30.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.77x | 14.00x | 11.20x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 1.95x | 1.50x | 1.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.60x | 25.11x | — | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.93x | 25.36x | 16.90x | 86.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — LIVE and HD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $8 for FND. HD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIVE's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIVE scores 7/9 vs FND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.3% | +110.5% | — | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +13.5% | +12.3% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +32.1% | +76.2% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +29.8% | +33.6% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 1.48x | — | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208M | $17.6B | $6.2B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $1.4B | $982M | $249M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $19.0B | $7.2B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.01x | 8.71x | 8.90x | 22.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,096 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,513 for LIVE. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +5.4% total return vs FND's -29.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HD at 6.7% vs LIVE's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | -6.0% | -5.5% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.2% | -8.5% | +5.4% | -29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.1% | +21.4% | +19.9% | -44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.9% | +7.3% | +21.0% | -54.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.0% | +184.0% | +244.9% | +60.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.0% | +6.7% | +6.2% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HD and LOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HD is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 78.8% from its 52-week high vs LIVE's 50.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.84x | 0.86x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.88 | $426.75 | $293.06 | $92.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.01 | $310.42 | $210.33 | $46.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.9% | +75.6% | +78.8% | +55.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 43.1 | 44.4 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 3.6M | 2.2M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
HD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HD as "Buy", LOW as "Buy", FND as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for HD (target: $408) vs 22.6% for FND (target: $63). For income investors, HD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs LOW's 2.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $408.08 | $288.25 | $63.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 62 | 51 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $9.18 | $4.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
LOW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LIVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LIVE vs HD vs LOW vs FND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIVE or HD or LOW or FND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 26. 8x. On forward P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 07x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 30. 50x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) delivered a total return of +21. 0%, compared to -64. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +244. 9% versus LIVE's +33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FND is approximately 115% more volatile than HD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for The Home Depot, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 4. 5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIVE or HD or LOW or FND more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 07x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 30. 50x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) trades at 18. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HD: 26. 5% to $408. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIVE or HD or LOW or FND?
In this comparison, HD (2.
8% yield), LOW (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. LIVE, FND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LIVE or HD or LOW or FND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 0% yield, +244. 9% 10Y return). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +244. 9%, FND: +60. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIVE and HD and LOW and FND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LOW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FND is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HD, LOW pay a dividend while LIVE, FND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.