Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LIXT vs CASI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LIXT vs CASI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $25M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $27M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-49M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -168.0% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $13M |
LIXT vs CASI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixte Biotechnology… (LIXT) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| CASI Pharmaceutical… (CASI) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIXT vs CASI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09
- EPS growth 40.2%
- -38.9% 10Y total return vs CASI's -98.9%
CASI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and efficiency.
- 31.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -131.5% ROA vs LIXT's -178.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.2% revenue growth vs CASI's -15.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.6% margin vs CASI's -183.9% | |
| Dividends | 31.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +272.9% vs CASI's -91.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -131.5% ROA vs LIXT's -178.1% |
LIXT vs CASI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LIXT vs CASI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASI and LIXT operate at a comparable scale, with $27M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $27M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -168.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -183.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -103.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | -23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LIXT and CASI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $11M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.77x | -0.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.96x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIXT delivers a -2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CASI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASI scores 2/9 vs LIXT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -178.1% | -131.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -153.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.2% | -104.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 11.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -419.37x | -66.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIXT five years ago would be worth $1,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $91 for CASI. Over the past 12 months, LIXT leads with a +272.9% total return vs CASI's -91.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIXT at -6.6% vs CASI's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -81.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +272.9% | -91.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.5% | -94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.9% | -98.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.6% | -60.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIXT and CASI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASI is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIXT's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIXT currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs CASI's 4.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | -0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.26 | $3.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $0.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +4.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 24.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 901K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CASI is the only dividend payer here at 31.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +31.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LIXT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CASI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LIXT vs CASI: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — LIXT or CASI?
Over the past 5 years, Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) delivered a total return of -84. 4%, compared to -99. 1% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CASI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIXT returned -38. 9% versus CASI's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — LIXT or CASI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning LIXT is approximately -991% more volatile than CASI relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — LIXT or CASI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 40. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 7% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — LIXT or CASI?
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -137. 6% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIXT leads at 0. 0% versus -138. 8% for CASI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASI leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — LIXT or CASI?
In this comparison, CASI (31.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LIXT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is LIXT or CASI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12), 31. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CASI: -98. 9%, LIXT: -38. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LIXT and CASI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CASI pays a dividend while LIXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.