Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $28M | $30.32B | $8.98B | $9.54B | $12.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $16.63B | $4.03B | $8.10B | $2.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $1.39B | $-185M | $599M | $460M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% | 24.9% | 26.9% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.9% | 11.8% | 12.2% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.1x | 16.4x | 10.5x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $16.17B | $3.07B | $3.60B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $1.98B | $214M | $539M | $497M |
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixte Biotechnology… (LIXT) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 74.2 | -25.8% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 461.9 | +361.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 3.26x
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 3.26x
- 66.2% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- Beta 1.09 vs ICLR's 1.60
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- PEG 0.35 vs ICLR's 1.50
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ICLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 25.2x)
MEDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- 24.8% ROA vs LIXT's -178.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.2% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 25.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs ICLR's 1.60 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +321.4% vs ICLR's -10.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs LIXT's -178.1% |
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • LIXT leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and LIXT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $16.6B | $4.0B | $8.1B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $3.5B | $757M | $1.4B | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $1.4B | -$185M | $599M | $460M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $2.7B | $391M | $996M | $745M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.1% | +24.9% | +26.9% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +11.8% | +12.2% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | -4.6% | +7.4% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.1% | +9.7% | +12.3% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.4% | +1.2% | +0.6% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | +15.0% | -160.0% | -98.7% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 53% valuation discount to MEDP's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs ICLR's 1.87x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $30.3B | $9.0B | $9.5B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $44.5B | $11.8B | $12.6B | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.10x | 22.79x | -62.52x | 13.12x | 28.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.06x | 16.42x | 10.53x | 25.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.56x | — | 1.87x | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.97x | 12.98x | 7.95x | 21.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.86x | 2.24x | 1.15x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.40x | 4.67x | 2.81x | 1.09x | 27.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.78x | 17.31x | 8.53x | 17.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LIXT. ICLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs LIXT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +22.1% | -5.7% | +6.3% | +120.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -178.1% | +4.7% | -2.5% | +3.6% | +24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +8.7% | +6.3% | +6.5% | +154.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.2% | +11.0% | +8.1% | +7.8% | +65.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.44x | 0.95x | 0.38x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $14.2B | $2.9B | $3.1B | -$247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2.0B | $214M | $539M | $497M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $16.2B | $3.1B | $3.6B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -419.37x | 3.10x | 6.38x | 3.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,748 for LIXT. Over the past 12 months, LIXT leads with a +321.4% total return vs ICLR's -10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs ICLR's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | -20.7% | -10.1% | -33.7% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.4% | +16.5% | +32.8% | -10.0% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -5.9% | -4.2% | -34.1% | +104.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -23.8% | -46.9% | -45.4% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +166.5% | +119.2% | +91.0% | +1442.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | -2.0% | -1.4% | -13.0% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIXT and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 59.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.33x | 1.52x | 1.60x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.26 | $247.05 | $228.88 | $211.00 | $628.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $134.65 | $131.30 | $66.57 | $284.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +72.3% | +79.5% | +59.2% | +68.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 58.5 | 57.2 | 62.1 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 1.6M | 806K | 1.1M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for IQV (target: $226) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $225.63 | $205.43 | $149.63 | $498.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 36 | 30 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.0% | +5.2% | +7.5% |
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LIXT vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -82. 5% for Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (LIXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1443% versus LIXT's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 60β — meaning ICLR is approximately 47% more volatile than LIXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 0% for LIXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 26. 3% to $225. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LIXT or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1443% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1443%, ICLR: +91. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LIXT and IQV and CRL and ICLR and MEDP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.