Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $28M | $97M | $2M | $1.69B | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $27M | $55M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-35M | $-49M | $-164M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 35.8% | 99.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -168.0% | -237.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1M | $22M | $149M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $16M | $13M | $15M | $714M |
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixte Biotechnology… (LIXT) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| Oncolytics Biotech … (ONCY) | 100 | 36.9 | -63.1% |
| CASI Pharmaceutical… (CASI) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIXT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.09
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 3.26x
- 66.2% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
- Beta 1.09 vs NKTR's 1.85
ONCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 5.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
CASI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -15.8%, EPS growth -26.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
- 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs CASI's -91.2%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs LIXT's -31.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- -44.1% ROA vs ONCY's -188.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.2% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs NKTR's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs CASI's -91.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -44.1% ROA vs ONCY's -188.3% |
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CASI leads in 2 of 6 categories
IMVT leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • LIXT leads 0 • ONCY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $55M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -183.9% (CASI) to -3.0% (NKTR). On growth, NKTR holds the edge at -25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $27M | $55M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$35M | -$44M | -$130M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$35M | -$49M | -$164M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$26M | $0 | -$209M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +35.8% | +99.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -168.0% | -2.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -183.9% | -3.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -103.2% | -3.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -60.5% | -25.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | -16.7% | -23.6% | -4.5% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CASI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $97M | $2M | $1.7B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $86M | $11M | $1.8B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.10x | -3.00x | -0.06x | -8.57x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 0.08x | 30.64x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.40x | 15.70x | 1.25x | 15.66x | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ONCY. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CASI's 11.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASI scores 2/9 vs ONCY's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -7.6% | -3.0% | -4.0% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -178.1% | -188.3% | -131.5% | -62.8% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -153.0% | -57.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -148.2% | -145.5% | -104.6% | -55.7% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.18x | 11.96x | 1.66x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$15M | $9M | $134M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $16M | $13M | $15M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1M | $22M | $149M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -419.37x | — | -66.88x | -4.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for CASI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs CASI's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs CASI's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | -8.2% | -81.6% | +92.0% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.4% | +73.7% | -91.2% | +818.2% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -47.4% | -94.0% | +621.8% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | -68.5% | -99.1% | -72.3% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | -82.5% | -99.0% | -59.1% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.0% | -19.3% | -60.8% | +93.3% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CASI and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASI is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CASI's 4.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.12x | -0.12x | 1.85x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.26 | $1.51 | $3.09 | $109.00 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $0.33 | $0.05 | $7.99 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +59.6% | +4.9% | +76.5% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.1 | 45.0 | 24.2 | 53.4 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 41K | 1.1M | 146K | 991K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONCY as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 59.3% for NKTR (target: $133). CASI is the only dividend payer here at 31.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $132.83 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | — | 33 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +31.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.05 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CASI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
LIXT vs ONCY vs CASI vs NKTR vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the stronger pick with -15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Analysts rate Oncolytics Biotech Inc. (ONCY) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -99. 1% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CASI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus CASI's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately -1608% more volatile than CASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 12% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is pulling ahead at -15. 8% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 2% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASI leads at -1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT?
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc.
(LIXT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIXT leads at 0. 0% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT?
In this comparison, CASI (31.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LIXT, ONCY, NKTR, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LIXT or ONCY or CASI or NKTR or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12), 31. 1% yield). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CASI: -99. 0%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LIXT and ONCY and CASI and NKTR and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LIXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONCY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CASI pays a dividend while LIXT, ONCY, NKTR, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.