Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LLY vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LLY vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $932.64B | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $72.25B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25.27B | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 83.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 45.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | 28.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $42.50B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.16B | $194M |
LLY vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LLY vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.7% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +114.1% vs LLY's +28.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +114.1% vs LLY's +28.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
LLY vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LLY vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $72.2B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34.7B | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25.3B | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13.6B | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +169.9% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $932.6B | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $968.0B | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.01x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.59x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.31x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 33.41x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 103.95x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +101.2% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.7% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.8% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +46.6% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.60x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.3B | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.2B | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42.5B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 35.68x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $52,144 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs LLY's +28.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 32.4% vs DBVT's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.2% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.9% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +421.4% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1271.7% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1133.95 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $623.78 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LLY as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 27.5% for LLY (target: $1258). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1258.47 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
LLY leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DBVT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LLY vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LLY or DBVT a better buy right now?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 43.
0x trailing P/E (28. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LLY or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +421.
4%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1272% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LLY or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 77% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 160% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LLY or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96.
0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LLY or DBVT?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LLY or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 130.
5% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — LLY or DBVT?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LLY or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 6% yield, +1272% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1272%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LLY and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. LLY pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.