Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Travel Services
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $925M | $12.50B | $7.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $1.36B | $6.05B | $10.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $52M | $4M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 31.8% | 41.3% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 8.0% | -0.2% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 14.3x | 99.1x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $629M | $1.93B | $14.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $297M | $1.60B | $210M |
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| Accel Entertainment… (ACEL) | 100 | 112.5 | +12.5% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 86.8 | -13.2% |
| Norwegian Cruise Li… (NCLH) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs ACEL's 15.9%
- 12.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.1%
- +4.6% vs DKNG's -27.3%
- 6.1% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 11.6% vs -0.9%
ACEL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.84
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.84, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.84 vs NCLH's 2.26, lower leverage
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs NCLH's 3.7%
NCLH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.2x vs 99.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs NCLH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs NCLH's 2.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.6% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 11.6% vs -0.9% |
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNW leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACEL leads 2 • DKNG leads 0 • NCLH leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 7.4x ACEL's $1.4B. LNW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $1.4B | $6.1B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $182M | $266M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $52M | $4M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $153M | $612M | -$949M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +31.8% | +41.3% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +8.0% | -0.2% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +3.8% | +0.1% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +11.2% | +10.1% | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +8.5% | +42.8% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | 0.0% | +192.9% | +3.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ACEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, ACEL trades at a 29% valuation discount to LNW's 26.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACEL's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $925M | $12.5B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $1.3B | $12.8B | $22.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.62x | 18.93x | -3113.58x | 19.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.89x | 14.25x | 99.14x | 8.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 6.73x | 49.42x | 8.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 0.69x | 2.06x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 3.58x | 19.81x | 3.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.06x | 14.92x | 19.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKNG. ACEL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCLH's 6.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs NCLH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.2% | +19.0% | +0.5% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +4.7% | +0.1% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +13.8% | -0.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +11.3% | -0.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.16x | 2.30x | 3.06x | 6.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $333M | $330M | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $297M | $1.6B | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $629M | $1.9B | $14.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | 2.23x | 1.92x | 1.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNW five years ago would be worth $17,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, LNW leads with a +4.6% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNW at 18.3% vs DKNG's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -0.1% | -29.3% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | -1.8% | -27.3% | -0.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +25.8% | +4.3% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | -6.6% | -47.9% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1035.2% | +15.9% | +157.3% | -65.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +8.0% | +1.4% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ACEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCLH's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACEL currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.84x | 1.12x | 2.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $122.65 | $13.31 | $48.78 | $27.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $9.55 | $20.46 | $16.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +85.3% | +51.7% | +63.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 41.0 | 55.1 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 386K | 12.9M | 21.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNW as "Hold", ACEL as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", NCLH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 26.1% for ACEL (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $205.00 | $14.33 | $36.88 | $24.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 6 | 48 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +4.3% | +6.6% | +0.3% |
LNW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACEL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
LNW vs ACEL vs DKNG vs NCLH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
On trailing P/E, Accel Entertainment, Inc.
(ACEL) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Light & Wonder, Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
Over the past 5 years, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to -47. 9% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus NCLH's -65. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Accel Entertainment, Inc.
(ACEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. 's 2. 26β — meaning NCLH is approximately 170% more volatile than ACEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 3. 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Light & Wonder, Inc. grew EPS 110. 3% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 90. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LNW or ACEL or DKNG or NCLH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1035% 10Y return). Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, NCLH: -65. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNW and ACEL and DKNG and NCLH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LNW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NCLH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.