Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $12.50B | $2.98B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $6.05B | $1.24B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $4M | $37M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 41.3% | 34.9% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | -0.2% | 9.3% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 99.1x | 46.5x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $1.93B | $18M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $1.60B | $341M | $687M |
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 86.8 | -13.2% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 199.3 | +99.3% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs RSI's 189.9%
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 1.61x
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 23.0x)
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8%
RSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3%
PENN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 23.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs PENN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 11.6% vs 1.8% |
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNW leads in 3 of 6 categories
RSI leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PENN is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.0B annually — 5.6x RSI's $1.2B. LNW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $6.1B | $1.2B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $266M | $156M | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $4M | $37M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $612M | $147M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +41.3% | +34.9% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | -0.2% | +9.3% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +0.1% | +3.0% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +10.1% | +11.8% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +42.8% | +41.1% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +192.9% | +60.0% | +37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LNW and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, LNW trades at a 87% valuation discount to RSI's 199.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNW's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $12.5B | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $12.8B | $2.7B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.62x | -3113.58x | 199.21x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.89x | 99.14x | 46.52x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 49.42x | 20.87x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 2.06x | 2.63x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 19.81x | 21.70x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.06x | 19.31x | 18.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNW's 6.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs PENN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.2% | +0.5% | +12.9% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +0.1% | +6.0% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | -0.9% | — | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | -0.6% | +26.3% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.16x | 3.06x | 0.06x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $330M | -$322M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $1.6B | $341M | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $1.9B | $18M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | 1.92x | — | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs PENN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -29.3% | +44.4% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | -27.3% | +138.2% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +4.3% | +766.1% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | -47.9% | +113.9% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1035.2% | +157.3% | +189.9% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +1.4% | +105.4% | -13.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNW and RSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNW is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.12x | 1.07x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $122.65 | $48.78 | $29.24 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $20.46 | $11.50 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +51.7% | +95.4% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.1 | 69.5 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 12.9M | 1.7M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LNW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNW as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", RSI as "Buy", PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 9.0% for RSI (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $205.00 | $36.88 | $30.40 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 48 | 13 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +6.6% | +0.3% | +15.8% |
LNW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RSI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LNW vs DKNG vs RSI vs PENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
On trailing P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Rush Street Interactive, Inc. at 199. 2x. On forward P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus PENN's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 29% more volatile than LNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 6% for Light & Wonder, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 83. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LNW or DKNG or RSI or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1035% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNW and DKNG and RSI and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LNW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.