Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $229M | $1.04T | $6.07B | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $703.06B | $2.86B | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $22.91B | $285M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 24.9% | 72.0% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -183.7% | 4.1% | 14.3% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x | 18.5x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $67.09B | $742M | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $10.73B | $1.40B | $1.87B |
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC) | 100 | 157.5 | +57.5% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 198.0 | +98.0% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOGC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
ETSY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- 7.9% revenue growth vs LOGC's -85.0%
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 44.7x)
- 17.6% margin vs LOGC's -174.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs LOGC's -85.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs LOGC's -174.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ETSY's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs LOGC's +19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs LOGC's -6.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs -169.3% |
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
EBAY leads 1 • LOGC leads 0 • ETSY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ETSY and EBAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT and LOGC operate at a comparable scale, with $703.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOGC's -174.4%. On growth, EBAY holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $703.1B | $2.9B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $42.8B | $508M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $22.9B | $285M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $15.3B | $673M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +24.9% | +72.0% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -183.7% | +4.1% | +14.3% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -174.4% | +3.3% | +9.9% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +2.2% | +23.5% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% | +3.1% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.7% | +35.1% | +2.2% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LOGC and ETSY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 49% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETSY's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $229M | $1.04T | $6.1B | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $163M | $1.09T | $5.4B | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.95x | 47.69x | 46.03x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x | 18.51x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x | 11.53x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.34x | 1.46x | 2.11x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 10.45x | — | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.97x | 9.51x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-6 for LOGC. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs LOGC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.4% | +22.3% | — | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +7.9% | +10.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -169.3% | +14.7% | — | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.8% | +17.5% | +22.9% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | — | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $56.4B | -$653M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $10.7B | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $67.1B | $742M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.85x | 27.47x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,866 for ETSY. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +54.2% total return vs LOGC's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs ETSY's -11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | +15.7% | +11.7% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | +32.7% | +39.3% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +160.5% | -31.0% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +186.9% | -61.3% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | +499.5% | +681.2% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +37.6% | -11.7% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETSY's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs ETSY's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.12x | 1.22x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.14 | $134.69 | $76.52 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.40 | $91.89 | $44.00 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.1% | +96.7% | +83.6% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 55.9 | 59.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 17.2M | 2.8M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOGC as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for ETSY (target: $70) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, EBAY offers the higher dividend yield at 1.08% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $70.07 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 64 | 45 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.8% | +12.8% | +5.1% |
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). EBAY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
LOGC vs WMT vs ETSY vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -85. 0% for ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -61. 3% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETSY returned +681. 2% versus LOGC's +59. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Etsy, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning ETSY is approximately 946% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -85. 0% for ContextLogic Inc. (LOGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ContextLogic Inc. grew EPS 78. 1% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Etsy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -174. 4% for ContextLogic Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -183. 7% for LOGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETSY leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ETSY: 9. 5% to $70. 07.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LOGC, ETSY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LOGC or WMT or ETSY or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, ETSY: +681. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOGC and WMT and ETSY and EBAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOGC (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WMT, EBAY pay a dividend while LOGC, ETSY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.