LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LPSN vs ZM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$32.31B
5Y Perf.-41.4%
LPSN vs ZM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LPSN | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $30M | $32.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $244M | $4.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $1.90B |
| Gross Margin | 62.2% | 77.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.6% | 23.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.9x |
| Total Debt | $392M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $95M | $1.27B |
LPSN vs ZM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LPSN
ZM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Zoom Communications… (ZM) | 100 | 58.6 | -41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPSN vs ZM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZM leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, LPSN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: technology exposure
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
The Income Pick
ZM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.95
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 92.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 69.6% 10Y total return vs LPSN's -97.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZM | 4.4% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% |
| Quality / Margins | ZM | 39.0% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% |
| Stability / Safety | ZM | Beta 0.95 vs LPSN's 2.05 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZM | +34.7% vs LPSN's -80.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ZM | 15.9% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs -6.6% |
LPSN vs ZM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
LPSN vs ZM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZMLAGGINGLPSN
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
1leads
ZMZoom Communications, …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LPSNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ZM6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LPSN2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ZM6/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ZM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZM is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 20.0x LPSN's $244M. ZM is the more profitable business, keeping 39.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, ZM holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $244M | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$562,000 | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.2% | +77.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +23.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.6% | +39.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.4% | +91.4% |
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LPSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $32.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $327M | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | 17.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 6.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.79x |
LPSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZM scores 7/9 vs LPSN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.4% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.6% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | +11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $297M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $95M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $392M | $31M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.20x | — |
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZM five years ago would be worth $3,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, ZM leads with a +34.7% total return vs LPSN's -80.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZM at 18.7% vs LPSN's -66.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.5% | +26.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.6% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +67.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -64.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +69.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -66.1% | +18.7% |
ZM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZM currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 11.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.60 | $109.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.37 | $69.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.6% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 81.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 146K | 4.5M |
ZM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LPSNLivePerson, Inc. | ZMZoom Communicatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $100.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LPSN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallZoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LPSN vs ZM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPSN or ZM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) a "Hold" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LPSN or ZM?
Over the past 5 years, Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) delivered a total return of -64. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZM returned +69. 6% versus LPSN's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LPSN or ZM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 115% more volatile than ZM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LPSN or ZM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zoom Communications, Inc. grew EPS 92. 5% year-over-year, compared to 45. 4% for LivePerson, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZM leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LPSN or ZM?
Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZM leads at 23. 1% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZM leads at 77. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LPSN or ZM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LPSN or ZM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZM: +69. 6%, LPSN: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LPSN and ZM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZM is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LPSN: -19.0% · ZM: 5.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.