Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $525M | $33M | $11.81B | $17M | $63.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19.15T | $81M | $1.37B | $44M | $2.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4.11T | $-5M | $-55M | $-1M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 29.9% | 55.7% | 4.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22.2% | -4.3% | 8.2% | -4.5% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 55.2x | — | 114.4x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $10M | $692M | $4M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $6M | $424M | $3M | $521M |
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LightPath Technolog… (LPTH) | 100 | 518.5 | +418.5% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
| SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, LPTH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OESX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.10 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
VIAV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (55.2x vs 114.4x)
LEDS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 53.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 82.7%
- 7.3% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0%
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs VIAV's 7.2%
- 17.7% margin vs LPTH's -21.4%
- +12.5% vs LEDS's -6.0%
- 8.5% ROA vs LPTH's -11.4%, ROIC -4.3% vs -28.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs OESX's -12.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (55.2x vs 114.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs LPTH's -21.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs LEDS's -6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs LPTH's -11.4%, ROIC -4.3% vs -28.1% |
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LITE leads in 3 of 6 categories
LPTH leads 0 • OESX leads 0 • VIAV leads 0 • LEDS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LPTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.15T annually — 432110.9x LEDS's $44M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPTH's -21.4%. On growth, LPTH holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19.15T | $81M | $1.4B | $44M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4.25T | -$1M | $207M | -$1M | $425M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.11T | -$5M | -$55M | -$1M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.96T | $348M | $46M | $2M | $399M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +29.9% | +55.7% | +4.9% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.2% | -4.3% | +8.2% | -4.5% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.4% | -5.6% | -4.0% | -3.0% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | +4.3% | +3.3% | +5.1% | +16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | +7.7% | +42.8% | +103.7% | +90.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | +109.6% | -70.2% | -18.7% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VIAV and LEDS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 340.3x trailing earnings, VIAV trades at a 86% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VIAV's 90.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $525M | $33M | $11.8B | $17M | $63.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $535M | $37M | $12.1B | $18M | $65.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.42x | -2.57x | 340.33x | -13.53x | 2412.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 55.18x | — | 114.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 74.57x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 90.43x | — | 859.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.11x | 0.41x | 10.89x | 0.39x | 38.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 31.43x | 2.56x | 14.77x | 5.64x | 54.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 66.51x | 190.52x | 10.16x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-184 for LPTH. OESX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs LPTH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -184.1% | -0.0% | -6.9% | -64.0% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | -0.0% | -2.3% | -9.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.1% | -34.8% | +5.5% | -24.9% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.6% | -34.9% | +4.9% | -38.3% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.87x | 0.89x | 1.44x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $4M | $269M | $1M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $6M | $424M | $3M | $521M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $10M | $692M | $4M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | -3.29x | 2.70x | -14.59x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs LEDS's -6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs OESX's -15.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -38.0% | +181.3% | +25.3% | +131.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +411.9% | +31.2% | +466.6% | -6.0% | +1247.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +778.1% | -38.7% | +461.0% | +0.7% | +1764.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +354.0% | -83.6% | +212.0% | -74.5% | +976.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +533.2% | -32.5% | +715.5% | +9.7% | +3635.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +106.3% | -15.1% | +77.7% | +0.2% | +165.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OESX and LITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OESX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 87.4% from its 52-week high vs OESX's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.59x | 1.10x | 1.54x | 1.91x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.53 | $18.64 | $60.43 | $3.37 | $1021.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $5.50 | $8.87 | $1.01 | $60.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.8% | +49.6% | +84.5% | +60.2% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 41.8 | 66.7 | 73.5 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 39K | 6.3M | 23K | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OESX and VIAV each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPTH as "Buy", VIAV as "Buy", LITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for LPTH (target: $15) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.88 | — | $32.25 | — | $643.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — | 19 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LITE leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
LPTH vs OESX vs VIAV vs LEDS vs LITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is the stronger pick with 729.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) offers the better valuation at 340. 3x trailing P/E (55. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LightPath Technologies, Inc. (LPTH) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
On trailing P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the cheapest at 340. 3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus OESX's -32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orion Energy Systems, Inc.
(OESX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning LITE is approximately 145% more volatile than OESX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) is pulling ahead at 729.
8% versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 4% for LightPath Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEDS leads at 82. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -40. 0% for LightPath Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIAV leads at 6. 5% versus -31. 8% for LPTH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) trades at 55. 2x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 59. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPTH: 23. 7% to $14. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LPTH or OESX or VIAV or LEDS or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 5% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIAV: +715. 5%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPTH and OESX and VIAV and LEDS and LITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (LPTH (Technology) and OESX (Industrials) and VIAV (Technology) and LEDS (Technology) and LITE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LPTH is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LEDS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.