Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.-89.9%
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$617M
5Y Perf.-75.7%
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • IL
Market Cap$825M
5Y Perf.-78.8%
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.81B
5Y Perf.-39.6%
TOST
Toast, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.02B
5Y Perf.-41.2%

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LSPD logoLSPD
PAR logoPAR
RSKD logoRSKD
FOUR logoFOUR
TOST logoTOST
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1.34B$617M$825M$3.81B$17.02B
Revenue (TTM)$1.19B$476M$345M$3.33B$6.45B
Net Income (TTM)$-693M$-76M$-28M$86M$412M
Gross Margin39.6%40.1%51.5%35.2%26.2%
Operating Margin-58.5%-13.5%-9.8%11.3%5.6%
Forward P/E20.0x28.3x20.8x8.4x23.7x
Total Debt$17M$402M$25M$4.62B$40M
Cash & Equiv.$558M$80M$162M$964M$1.35B

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LSPD
PAR
RSKD
FOUR
TOST
StockSep 21May 26Return
Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD)10010.1-89.9%
PAR Technology Corp… (PAR)10024.3-75.7%
Riskified Ltd. (RSKD)10021.2-78.8%
Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR)10060.4-39.6%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)10058.8-41.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RSKD and FOUR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Shift4 Payments, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. TOST and PAR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LSPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation
The Income Pick

PAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.54
  • 30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
Best for: income & stability
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

RSKD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
  • +2.0% vs PAR's -75.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FOUR
Shift4 Payments, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FOUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 39.7% 10Y total return vs PAR's 167.3%
  • Lower P/E (8.4x vs 23.7x)
  • 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
TOST
Toast, Inc.
The Growth Play

TOST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
  • 6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
  • 13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPAR logoPAR30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
ValueFOUR logoFOURLower P/E (8.4x vs 23.7x)
Quality / MarginsTOST logoTOST6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
Stability / SafetyRSKD logoRSKDBeta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
DividendsFOUR logoFOUR0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RSKD logoRSKD+2.0% vs PAR's -75.6%
Efficiency (ROA)TOST logoTOST13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LSPDLightspeed Commerce Inc.
FY 2025
Transaction Based Revenue
64.8%$697M
Subscription Revenue
32.0%$345M
Hardware And Other Revenue
3.2%$35M
PARPAR Technology Corporation
FY 2025
Subscription Service
63.9%$291M
Hardware
23.4%$106M
Professional Service
12.7%$58M
RSKDRiskified Ltd.
FY 2024
Fraud Service Revenue
57.5%$188M
Indemnification Service Revenue
42.5%$139M
FOURShift4 Payments, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments Based Revenue
88.4%$3.5B
Subscription And Other Revenues
11.6%$454M
TOSTToast, Inc.
FY 2025
Technology Service
84.3%$5.0B
License
15.7%$936M

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRSKDLAGGINGPAR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RSKD and FOUR and TOST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 18.7x RSKD's $345M. TOST is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, TOST holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$476M$345M$3.3B$6.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$562M-$27M-$27M$629M$409M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$693M-$76M-$28M$86M$412M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$31M-$29M$34M$687M$654M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.6%+40.1%+51.5%+35.2%+26.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-58.5%-13.5%-9.8%+11.3%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-58.0%-16.0%-8.0%+2.6%+6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.6%-6.0%+9.9%+20.6%+10.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%+19.4%+6.2%-100.0%+21.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.2%+36.1%+2.5%-105.0%+127.5%
Evenly matched — RSKD and FOUR and TOST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 43.4x trailing earnings, FOUR trades at a 17% valuation discount to TOST's 52.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOUR's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOST's 42.2x.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$617M$825M$3.8B$17.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$801M$940M$687M$7.5B$15.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.25x-7.16x-26.81x43.39x52.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.04x28.32x20.80x8.41x23.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.53x42.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.25x1.36x2.39x0.91x2.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x0.73x2.58x2.13x8.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.94x7.63x27.99x
FOUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TOST delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOUR's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs PAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-46.1%-9.1%-8.4%+4.4%+20.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.3%-5.5%-6.3%+1.0%+13.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.8%-4.2%-22.2%+6.3%+30.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.9%-5.1%-7.6%+6.3%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.49x0.08x2.36x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$541M$323M-$137M$3.7B-$1.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$558M$80M$162M$964M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17M$402M$25M$4.6B$40M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-510.59x-21.71x3.40x
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RSKD and TOST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOUR five years ago would be worth $5,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,561 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, RSKD leads with a +2.0% total return vs PAR's -75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 14.9% vs PAR's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.7%-58.1%+0.3%-25.2%-13.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.3%-75.6%+2.0%-43.7%-17.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.0%-49.2%+2.2%-24.0%+51.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.4%-80.9%-81.4%-46.4%-53.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.3%+167.3%-81.4%+39.7%-53.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.5%-20.2%+0.7%-8.7%+14.9%
Evenly matched — RSKD and TOST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RSKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LSPD's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSKD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x1.54x1.05x1.51x1.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.34$72.15$5.68$108.50$49.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.37$11.59$3.70$39.91$24.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.2%+20.7%+84.9%+43.2%+59.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.247.363.843.350.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded831K1.9M763K2.2M9.9M
RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LSPD as "Buy", PAR as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy", TOST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 19.2% for RSKD (target: $6). FOUR is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.FOUR logoFOURShift4 Payments, …TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.30$25.00$5.75$73.36$39.76
# AnalystsCovering analysts1511112929
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.34
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.9%+1.1%+12.9%+12.8%+0.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FOUR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TOST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallRiskified Ltd. (RSKD)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LSPD vs PAR vs RSKD vs FOUR vs TOST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

On trailing P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the cheapest at 43. 4x versus Toast, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

Over the past 5 years, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) delivered a total return of -46. 4%, compared to -84. 4% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +167. 3% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Riskified Ltd.

(RSKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Lightspeed Commerce Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning LSPD is approximately 51% more volatile than RSKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Shift4 Payments, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.

2% versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOST leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

Toast, Inc.

(TOST) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOUR leads at 8. 4% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSKD leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 67. 0% to $25. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST?

In this comparison, FOUR (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. LSPD, PAR, RSKD, TOST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LSPD or PAR or RSKD or FOUR or TOST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(FOUR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOUR: +39. 7%, LSPD: -70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LSPD and PAR and RSKD and FOUR and TOST?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FOUR pays a dividend while LSPD, PAR, RSKD, TOST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LSPD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RSKD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOUR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LSPD and PAR and RSKD and FOUR and TOST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LSPD: 11.5% · PAR: 19.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.