Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.34B
5Y Perf.-89.9%
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$617M
5Y Perf.-75.7%
TOST
Toast, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.02B
5Y Perf.-41.2%
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • IL
Market Cap$825M
5Y Perf.-78.8%

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LSPD logoLSPD
PAR logoPAR
TOST logoTOST
RSKD logoRSKD
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1.34B$617M$17.02B$825M
Revenue (TTM)$1.19B$476M$6.45B$345M
Net Income (TTM)$-693M$-76M$412M$-28M
Gross Margin39.6%40.1%26.2%51.5%
Operating Margin-58.5%-13.5%5.6%-9.8%
Forward P/E20.0x28.3x23.7x20.8x
Total Debt$17M$402M$40M$25M
Cash & Equiv.$558M$80M$1.35B$162M

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LSPD
PAR
TOST
RSKD
StockSep 21May 26Return
Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD)10010.1-89.9%
PAR Technology Corp… (PAR)10024.3-75.7%
Toast, Inc. (TOST)10058.8-41.2%
Riskified Ltd. (RSKD)10021.2-78.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TOST and RSKD are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Riskified Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. LSPD and PAR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
The Value Play

LSPD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (20.0x vs 23.7x)
Best for: value
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

PAR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 167.3% 10Y total return vs TOST's -53.0%
  • 30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
TOST
Toast, Inc.
The Growth Play

TOST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
  • 6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
  • 13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%
Best for: growth exposure
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.
The Income Pick

RSKD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.05
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPAR logoPAR30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
ValueLSPD logoLSPDLower P/E (20.0x vs 23.7x)
Quality / MarginsTOST logoTOST6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
Stability / SafetyRSKD logoRSKDBeta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RSKD logoRSKD+2.0% vs PAR's -75.6%
Efficiency (ROA)TOST logoTOST13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LSPDLightspeed Commerce Inc.
FY 2025
Transaction Based Revenue
64.8%$697M
Subscription Revenue
32.0%$345M
Hardware And Other Revenue
3.2%$35M
PARPAR Technology Corporation
FY 2025
Subscription Service
63.9%$291M
Hardware
23.4%$106M
Professional Service
12.7%$58M
TOSTToast, Inc.
FY 2025
Technology Service
84.3%$5.0B
License
15.7%$936M
RSKDRiskified Ltd.
FY 2024
Fraud Service Revenue
57.5%$188M
Indemnification Service Revenue
42.5%$139M

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTOSTLAGGINGPAR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TOST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 18.7x RSKD's $345M. TOST is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, TOST holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$476M$6.4B$345M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$562M-$27M$409M-$27M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$693M-$76M$412M-$28M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$31M-$29M$654M$34M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.6%+40.1%+26.2%+51.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-58.5%-13.5%+5.6%-9.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-58.0%-16.0%+6.4%-8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.6%-6.0%+10.1%+9.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%+19.4%+21.9%+6.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.2%+36.1%+127.5%+2.5%
TOST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LSPD and RSKD each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$617M$17.0B$825M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$801M$940M$15.7B$687M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.25x-7.16x52.43x-26.81x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.04x28.32x23.69x20.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple42.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.25x1.36x2.77x2.39x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.90x0.73x8.39x2.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.99x24.94x
Evenly matched — LSPD and RSKD each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TOST delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs PAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-46.1%-9.1%+20.7%-8.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.3%-5.5%+13.8%-6.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.8%-4.2%+30.8%-22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-33.9%-5.1%+15.9%-7.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93275
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.49x0.02x0.08x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$541M$323M-$1.3B-$137M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$558M$80M$1.4B$162M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17M$402M$40M$25M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-510.59x-21.71x
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TOST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TOST five years ago would be worth $4,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,561 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, RSKD leads with a +2.0% total return vs PAR's -75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 14.9% vs PAR's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.7%-58.1%-13.7%+0.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+0.3%-75.6%-17.4%+2.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.0%-49.2%+51.7%+2.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.4%-80.9%-53.0%-81.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.3%+167.3%-53.0%-81.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.5%-20.2%+14.9%+0.7%
TOST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RSKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LSPD's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSKD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x1.54x1.44x1.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.34$72.15$49.66$5.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.37$11.59$24.35$3.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.2%+20.7%+59.1%+84.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.247.350.563.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded831K1.9M9.9M763K
RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: LSPD as "Buy", PAR as "Buy", TOST as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 19.2% for RSKD (target: $6).

MetricLSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…TOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.30$25.00$39.76$5.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts15112911
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.9%+1.1%+0.6%+12.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TOST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RSKD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallToast, Inc. (TOST)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). Toast, Inc. (TOST) offers the better valuation at 52. 4x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

On forward P/E, Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

is actually cheaper at 20. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

Over the past 5 years, Toast, Inc.

(TOST) delivered a total return of -53. 0%, compared to -84. 4% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +167. 3% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Riskified Ltd.

(RSKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Lightspeed Commerce Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning LSPD is approximately 51% more volatile than RSKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.

2% versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOST leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

Toast, Inc.

(TOST) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOST leads at 5. 0% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSKD leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

(LSPD) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 67. 0% to $25. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riskified Ltd.

(RSKD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSKD: -81. 4%, LSPD: -70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LSPD and PAR and TOST and RSKD?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LSPD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RSKD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LSPD and PAR and TOST and RSKD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LSPD: 11.5% · PAR: 19.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.