Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.34B | $617M | $17.02B | $825M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $476M | $6.45B | $345M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-693M | $-76M | $412M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 40.1% | 26.2% | 51.5% |
| Operating Margin | -58.5% | -13.5% | 5.6% | -9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 28.3x | 23.7x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $402M | $40M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $558M | $80M | $1.35B | $162M |
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD) | 100 | 10.1 | -89.9% |
| PAR Technology Corp… (PAR) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) | 100 | 21.2 | -78.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSPD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 23.7x)
PAR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 167.3% 10Y total return vs TOST's -53.0%
- 30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2%
TOST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- 6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
- 13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%
RSKD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.05
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
- Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.2% revenue growth vs RSKD's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 23.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs LSPD's -58.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.0% vs PAR's -75.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8% |
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TOST leads in 3 of 6 categories
RSKD leads 1 • LSPD leads 0 • PAR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 18.7x RSKD's $345M. TOST is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, TOST holds the edge at +21.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $476M | $6.4B | $345M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$562M | -$27M | $409M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$693M | -$76M | $412M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | -$29M | $654M | $34M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +40.1% | +26.2% | +51.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.5% | -13.5% | +5.6% | -9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -58.0% | -16.0% | +6.4% | -8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -6.0% | +10.1% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +19.4% | +21.9% | +6.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.2% | +36.1% | +127.5% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LSPD and RSKD each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $617M | $17.0B | $825M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $801M | $940M | $15.7B | $687M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.25x | -7.16x | 52.43x | -26.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.04x | 28.32x | 23.69x | 20.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 42.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 1.36x | 2.77x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.73x | 8.39x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 27.99x | 24.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs PAR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.1% | -9.1% | +20.7% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.3% | -5.5% | +13.8% | -6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.8% | -4.2% | +30.8% | -22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.9% | -5.1% | +15.9% | -7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.49x | 0.02x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$541M | $323M | -$1.3B | -$137M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $558M | $80M | $1.4B | $162M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $402M | $40M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -510.59x | -21.71x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TOST five years ago would be worth $4,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,561 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, RSKD leads with a +2.0% total return vs PAR's -75.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 14.9% vs PAR's -20.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.7% | -58.1% | -13.7% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.3% | -75.6% | -17.4% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | -49.2% | +51.7% | +2.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -80.9% | -53.0% | -81.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | +167.3% | -53.0% | -81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | -20.2% | +14.9% | +0.7% |
Risk & Volatility
RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LSPD's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSKD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 20.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.54x | 1.44x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.34 | $72.15 | $49.66 | $5.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.37 | $11.59 | $24.35 | $3.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.2% | +20.7% | +59.1% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 47.3 | 50.5 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 831K | 1.9M | 9.9M | 763K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LSPD as "Buy", PAR as "Buy", TOST as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.0% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 19.2% for RSKD (target: $6).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.30 | $25.00 | $39.76 | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 29 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.9% | +1.1% | +0.6% | +12.9% |
TOST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RSKD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
LSPD vs PAR vs TOST vs RSKD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). Toast, Inc. (TOST) offers the better valuation at 52. 4x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
On forward P/E, Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
Over the past 5 years, Toast, Inc.
(TOST) delivered a total return of -53. 0%, compared to -84. 4% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +167. 3% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Riskified Ltd.
(RSKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Lightspeed Commerce Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning LSPD is approximately 51% more volatile than RSKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.
2% versus 5. 2% for Riskified Ltd. (RSKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOST leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
Toast, Inc.
(TOST) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 6% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOST leads at 5. 0% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSKD leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
(LSPD) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for PAR Technology Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 67. 0% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LSPD or PAR or TOST or RSKD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Riskified Ltd.
(RSKD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSKD: -81. 4%, LSPD: -70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSPD and PAR and TOST and RSKD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare TOST vs PAX
PAX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to TOST.
Compare RSKD vs FICO
FICO overlaps with RSKD in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add FOUR to This Comparison
FOUR is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.