Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTRN vs RXRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LTRN vs RXRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $23M | $1.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-560M |
| Gross Margin | — | -34.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.8% |
| Total Debt | $244K | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $743M |
LTRN vs RXRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) | 100 | 14.0 | -86.0% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTRN vs RXRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.42
- Lower volatility, beta 2.42, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 5.83x
- Beta 2.42, current ratio 5.83x
RXRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- -81.8% 10Y total return vs LTRN's -86.4%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs LTRN's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs LTRN's 0.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs RXRX's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.42 vs RXRX's 3.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -22.0% vs LTRN's -53.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.6% ROA vs LTRN's -97.4%, ROIC -95.8% vs -100.6% |
LTRN vs RXRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LTRN vs RXRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXRX and LTRN operate at a comparable scale, with $66M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$521M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$560M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$326M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -56.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LTRN and RXRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $797M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -2.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 19.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RXRX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RXRX delivers a -54.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-54 in annual profit, vs $-126 for LTRN. LTRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RXRX's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RXRX scores 4/9 vs LTRN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -126.0% | -54.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -40.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -100.6% | -95.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -71.4% | -50.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$665M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $743M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $243,657 | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -336.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RXRX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LTRN five years ago would be worth $1,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,179 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, RXRX leads with a -22.0% total return vs LTRN's -53.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RXRX at -16.4% vs LTRN's -27.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -22.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.0% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.5% | -41.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | -88.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.3% | -16.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTRN and RXRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LTRN is the less volatile stock with a 2.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RXRX currently trades 45.5% from its 52-week high vs LTRN's 35.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 2.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.74 | $7.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $2.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.5% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 694K | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RXRX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LTRN vs RXRX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTRN or RXRX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LTRN or RXRX?
Over the past 5 years, Lantern Pharma Inc.
(LTRN) delivered a total return of -86. 9%, compared to -88. 2% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RXRX returned -81. 6% versus LTRN's -86. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LTRN or RXRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantern Pharma Inc.
(LTRN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 49β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 99β — meaning RXRX is approximately 20% more volatile than LTRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LTRN or RXRX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 14. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1312. 6% for Lantern Pharma Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LTRN or RXRX?
Lantern Pharma Inc.
(LTRN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -863. 4% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LTRN leads at 0. 0% versus -867. 9% for RXRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LTRN leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LTRN or RXRX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LTRN or RXRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Lantern Pharma Inc. (LTRN) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RXRX: -81. 6%, LTRN: -86. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LTRN and RXRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.