Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.-23.3%
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$664M
5Y Perf.-77.1%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.27B
5Y Perf.+117.9%
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.32B
5Y Perf.-53.9%
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.03B
5Y Perf.-2.9%

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LUCK logoLUCK
PLAY logoPLAY
EAT logoEAT
FUN logoFUN
CAKE logoCAKE
IndustryLeisureEntertainmentRestaurantsLeisureRestaurants
Market Cap$1.04B$664M$6.27B$2.32B$3.03B
Revenue (TTM)$1.24B$2.11B$5.73B$2.90B$3.75B
Net Income (TTM)$-88M$300K$463M$-1.62B$148M
Gross Margin21.4%30.7%46.0%54.8%78.3%
Operating Margin11.7%7.1%10.4%-44.9%5.0%
Forward P/E1496.0x82.9x13.7x15.0x
Total Debt$2.63B$3.14B$1.69B$5.43B$3.46B
Cash & Equiv.$60M$7M$19M$91M$216M

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LUCK
PLAY
EAT
FUN
CAKE
StockApr 21May 26Return
Lucky Strike Entert… (LUCK)10076.7-23.3%
Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY)10022.9-77.1%
Brinker Internation… (EAT)100217.9+117.9%
Six Flags Entertain… (FUN)10046.1-53.9%
The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE)10097.1-2.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EAT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. LUCK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LUCK
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation
The Income Pick

LUCK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 3.2%
  • 3.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
The Growth Play

EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • 229.9% 10Y total return vs CAKE's 35.6%
  • 21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
  • Lower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
The Defensive Pick

CAKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 1.11, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 1.11 vs PLAY's 2.24, lower leverage
  • +23.5% vs PLAY's -50.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEAT logoEAT21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
ValueEAT logoEATLower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsEAT logoEAT8.1% margin vs FUN's -56.0%
Stability / SafetyCAKE logoCAKEBeta 1.11 vs PLAY's 2.24, lower leverage
DividendsLUCK logoLUCK3.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CAKE's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CAKE logoCAKE+23.5% vs PLAY's -50.1%
Efficiency (ROA)EAT logoEAT17.0% ROA vs FUN's -18.5%, ROIC 19.1% vs -15.1%

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LUCKLucky Strike Entertainment Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

PLAYDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2024
Entertainment
65.2%$1.4B
Food and Beverage
34.8%$742M
EATBrinker International, Inc.
FY 2025
Chili's Restaurants
90.7%$4.9B
Maggiano's Restaurants
9.3%$501M
FUNSix Flags Entertainment Corporation
FY 2025
Admission
51.1%$1.6B
Food, Merchandise and Gaming
33.5%$1.0B
Accommodations, Extra-Charge Products And Other
15.4%$478M
CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
FY 2025
The Cheesecake Factory
71.7%$2.7B
Other Segments
9.7%$362M
Other FRC
9.5%$355M
North Italia
9.2%$346M

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEATLAGGINGFUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LUCK and EAT and CAKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 4.6x LUCK's $1.2B. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -56.0%. On growth, CAKE holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$2.1B$5.7B$2.9B$3.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$281M$405M$819M-$810M$296M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$88M$300,000$463M-$1.6B$148M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$25M-$175M$504M$29M$155M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.4%+30.7%+46.0%+54.8%+78.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.7%+7.1%+10.4%-44.9%+5.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.1%+0.0%+8.1%-56.0%+4.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.0%-8.3%+8.8%+1.0%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.7%-1.1%+3.2%-100.0%+4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+43.7%-45.2%+12.1%-20.5%-28.6%
Evenly matched — LUCK and EAT and CAKE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PLAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.2x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 64% valuation discount to CAKE's 19.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLAY's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$664M$6.3B$2.3B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.6B$3.8B$7.9B$7.7B$6.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-57.54x7.17x17.58x-1.43x19.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1496.00x82.90x13.66x15.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.29x8.28x11.06x21.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x0.31x1.17x0.75x0.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.87x18.18x2.94x6.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.75x15.17x19.55x
PLAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EAT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FUN. EAT carries lower financial leverage with a 4.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 21.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EAT scores 7/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.2%+123.4%-50.4%+37.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.7%+0.0%+17.0%-18.5%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.4%+5.1%+19.1%-15.1%+4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%+6.4%+25.8%-17.7%+7.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966746
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage21.53x4.57x6.92x7.93x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.6B$3.1B$1.7B$5.3B$3.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$60M$7M$19M$91M$216M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.6B$3.1B$1.7B$5.4B$3.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.54x1.06x18.61x-2.60x16.15x
EAT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $22,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,334 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, CAKE leads with a +23.5% total return vs PLAY's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.2% vs PLAY's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.2%-38.6%-3.4%+46.9%+15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.4%-50.1%+5.3%-37.0%+23.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.7%-70.2%+295.8%-41.3%+92.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-18.5%-76.7%+125.8%-48.0%+2.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.7%-71.4%+229.9%-33.1%+35.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-17.4%-33.2%+58.2%-16.3%+24.3%
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAKE currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.33x2.24x1.12x1.83x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.61$35.53$187.12$38.47$69.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.71$9.65$100.30$12.51$43.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.4%+29.5%+78.2%+59.1%+87.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.138.350.658.050.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded78K1.7M1.2M1.7M1.2M
CAKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LUCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LUCK as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", EAT as "Buy", FUN as "Buy", CAKE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for PLAY (target: $20) vs 0.6% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, LUCK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs CAKE's 1.78%.

MetricLUCK logoLUCKLucky Strike Ente…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…CAKE logoCAKEThe Cheesecake Fa…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.83$20.25$184.46$22.88$65.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts619472948
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.9%+26.2%+1.4%0.0%+5.1%
LUCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

EAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PLAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBrinker International, Inc. (EAT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LUCK vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs CAKE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (82. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

(PLAY) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated at 19. 8x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +229. 9% versus PLAY's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

11β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning PLAY is approximately 101% more volatile than CAKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 22% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -50. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LUCK leads at 11. 4% versus -43. 7% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 1496. 0x for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation — 1482. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLAY: 93. 4% to $20. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE?

In this comparison, LUCK (3.

2% yield), CAKE (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY, EAT, FUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LUCK or PLAY or EAT or FUN or CAKE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

11), 1. 8% yield). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAKE: +35. 6%, PLAY: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LUCK and PLAY and EAT and FUN and CAKE?

These companies operate in different sectors (LUCK (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and EAT (Consumer Cyclical) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and CAKE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LUCK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LUCK, CAKE pay a dividend while PLAY, EAT, FUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LUCK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLAY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EAT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LUCK and PLAY and EAT and FUN and CAKE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LUCK: 0.7% · PLAY: -1.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.