Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LXEH
Lixiang Education Holding Co., Ltd.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$8.97B
5Y Perf.-64.9%
TAL
TAL Education Group

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$771M
5Y Perf.-82.8%
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • CN
Market Cap$760M
5Y Perf.-97.0%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.+205.0%

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LXEH logoLXEH
EDU logoEDU
TAL logoTAL
GOTU logoGOTU
PRDO logoPRDO
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$1M$8.97B$771M$760M$2.16B
Revenue (TTM)$84M$4.99B$2.66B$5.85B$855M
Net Income (TTM)$-151M$367M$171M$-374M$170M
Gross Margin1.9%55.1%54.4%67.5%51.8%
Operating Margin-160.6%9.0%2.7%-9.1%24.3%
Forward P/E16.2x18.1x12.0x
Total Debt$132M$804M$333M$492M$105M
Cash & Equiv.$221M$1.61B$1.77B$1.32B$132M

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LXEH
EDU
TAL
GOTU
PRDO
StockOct 20May 26Return
Lixiang Education H… (LXEH)1000.1-99.9%
New Oriental Educat… (EDU)10035.1-64.9%
TAL Education Group (TAL)10017.2-82.8%
Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU)1003.0-97.0%
Perdoceo Education … (PRDO)100305.0+205.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRDO leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. TAL Education Group is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. GOTU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LXEH
Lixiang Education Holding Co., Ltd.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

LXEH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EDU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
TAL
TAL Education Group
The Growth Play

TAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
  • +23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1%
Best for: growth exposure
GOTU
Gaotu Techedu Inc.
The Growth Leader

GOTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
Best for: growth
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
The Income Pick

PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs EDU's 47.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
  • Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGOTU logoGOTU56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
ValuePRDO logoPRDOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsPRDO logoPRDO19.9% margin vs LXEH's -179.3%
Stability / SafetyPRDO logoPRDOBeta 0.48 vs GOTU's 0.99, lower leverage
DividendsPRDO logoPRDO1.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EDU's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TAL logoTAL+23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1%
Efficiency (ROA)PRDO logoPRDO13.2% ROA vs LXEH's -31.3%, ROIC 15.3% vs -60.7%

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LXEHLixiang Education Holding Co., Ltd.
FY 2022
Education Services Member
100.0%$41M
EDUNew Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
FY 2025
Service
88.4%$4.3B
Product
11.6%$566M
TALTAL Education Group
FY 2022
Small class learning services, personalized premium services and others
69.6%$3.1B
Online education services through www.xueersi.com
30.4%$1.3B
GOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.
FY 2024
Learning Services
98.9%$4.4B
Other Revenue
1.1%$50M
PRDOPerdoceo Education Corporation
FY 2025
C T U
54.6%$462M
A I U S
26.8%$226M
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, LLC
18.6%$158M

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRDOLAGGINGGOTU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 69.3x LXEH's $84M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LXEH's -179.3%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$84M$5.0B$2.7B$5.8B$855M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$121M$563M$72M-$378M$247M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$151M$367M$171M-$374M$170M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$61M$737M$441M$0$221M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+1.9%+55.1%+54.4%+67.5%+51.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-160.6%+9.0%+2.7%-9.1%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-179.3%+7.4%+6.5%-6.4%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-72.7%+14.8%+16.6%+1.7%+25.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-31.7%+6.1%+38.7%+32.9%+4.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+87.0%0.0%-21.4%+66.7%+30.8%
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LXEH and TAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 63% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRDO's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EDU's 15.3x.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Market CapShares × price$1M$9.0B$771M$760M$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$12M$8.2B-$667M$638M$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.39x24.50x9.05x-4.86x14.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.25x18.12x12.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.25x-16.38x8.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.29x1.83x0.34x1.12x2.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x2.31x0.20x2.67x2.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.07x2.70x64.81x9.97x
Evenly matched — LXEH and TAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

PRDO delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LXEH. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXEH's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs LXEH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-83.5%+9.1%+4.7%-21.8%+17.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-31.3%+4.8%+3.1%-6.8%+13.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-60.7%+9.9%-0.3%-47.8%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.5%+9.5%-0.2%-39.9%+17.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.90x0.20x0.09x0.25x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$89M-$809M-$1.6B-$829M-$27M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$221M$1.6B$1.8B$1.3B$132M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$132M$804M$333M$492M$105M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.28x1570.90x50.21x
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for LXEH. Over the past 12 months, TAL leads with a +23.9% total return vs LXEH's -96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs LXEH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-38.0%-2.5%-0.8%-19.3%+18.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.1%+19.4%+23.9%-39.4%+15.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%+37.2%+103.2%-32.3%+195.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-61.5%-79.7%-92.4%+198.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+47.3%+27.3%-81.2%+505.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-80.2%+11.1%+26.7%-12.2%+43.5%
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LXEH and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LXEH is the less volatile stock with a -0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOTU's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs LXEH's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.92x0.82x0.96x0.99x0.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.00$64.97$13.37$4.56$38.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.19$41.62$9.04$1.84$26.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.6%+86.7%+85.3%+43.2%+89.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.054.852.352.746.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded128K689K3.3M395K584K
Evenly matched — LXEH and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: EDU as "Buy", TAL as "Hold", GOTU as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, PRDO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.62% vs EDU's 1.08%.

MetricLXEH logoLXEHLixiang Education…EDU logoEDUNew Oriental Educ…TAL logoTALTAL Education Gro…GOTU logoGOTUGaotu Techedu Inc.PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$68.00$18.00$2.94$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2428109
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises505
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.61$0.56
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.0%+1.7%+4.0%+5.6%
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallPerdoceo Education Corporat… (PRDO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.

(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.

0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.

5%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.

, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning GOTU is approximately -207% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 90% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.

(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

9% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 12.

0x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?

In this comparison, PRDO (1.

6% yield), EDU (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.

, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LXEH and EDU and TAL and GOTU and PRDO?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LXEH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. EDU, PRDO pay a dividend while LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LXEH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EDU

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOTU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRDO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LXEH and EDU and TAL and GOTU and PRDO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LXEH: -31.7% · EDU: 6.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.