Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1M | $8.97B | $771M | $760M | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $4.99B | $2.66B | $5.85B | $855M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-151M | $367M | $171M | $-374M | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 1.9% | 55.1% | 54.4% | 67.5% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | -160.6% | 9.0% | 2.7% | -9.1% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.2x | 18.1x | — | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $132M | $804M | $333M | $492M | $105M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $221M | $1.61B | $1.77B | $1.32B | $132M |
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixiang Education H… (LXEH) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 17.2 | -82.8% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 305.0 | +205.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXEH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, EDU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- +23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1%
GOTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5%
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs EDU's 47.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs LXEH's -35.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs LXEH's -179.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs GOTU's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EDU's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs LXEH's -96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs LXEH's -31.3%, ROIC 15.3% vs -60.7% |
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories
LXEH leads 0 • EDU leads 0 • TAL leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 69.3x LXEH's $84M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LXEH's -179.3%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $5.0B | $2.7B | $5.8B | $855M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | $563M | $72M | -$378M | $247M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$151M | $367M | $171M | -$374M | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$61M | $737M | $441M | $0 | $221M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +55.1% | +54.4% | +67.5% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -160.6% | +9.0% | +2.7% | -9.1% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -179.3% | +7.4% | +6.5% | -6.4% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -72.7% | +14.8% | +16.6% | +1.7% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +6.1% | +38.7% | +32.9% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.0% | 0.0% | -21.4% | +66.7% | +30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LXEH and TAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 63% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRDO's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EDU's 15.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $9.0B | $771M | $760M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $8.2B | -$667M | $638M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 24.50x | 9.05x | -4.86x | 14.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.25x | 18.12x | — | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.25x | -16.38x | — | 8.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.83x | 0.34x | 1.12x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 2.31x | 0.20x | 2.67x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.07x | 2.70x | 64.81x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LXEH. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LXEH's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs LXEH's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.5% | +9.1% | +4.7% | -21.8% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.3% | +4.8% | +3.1% | -6.8% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.7% | +9.9% | -0.3% | -47.8% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | +9.5% | -0.2% | -39.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.90x | 0.20x | 0.09x | 0.25x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$89M | -$809M | -$1.6B | -$829M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $221M | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.3B | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $804M | $333M | $492M | $105M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.28x | 1570.90x | — | — | 50.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for LXEH. Over the past 12 months, TAL leads with a +23.9% total return vs LXEH's -96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs LXEH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.0% | -2.5% | -0.8% | -19.3% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.1% | +19.4% | +23.9% | -39.4% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +37.2% | +103.2% | -32.3% | +195.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -61.5% | -79.7% | -92.4% | +198.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +47.3% | +27.3% | -81.2% | +505.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +11.1% | +26.7% | -12.2% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LXEH and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LXEH is the less volatile stock with a -0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOTU's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs LXEH's 3.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.92x | 0.82x | 0.96x | 0.99x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.00 | $64.97 | $13.37 | $4.56 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $41.62 | $9.04 | $1.84 | $26.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.6% | +86.7% | +85.3% | +43.2% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 54.8 | 52.3 | 52.7 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 689K | 3.3M | 395K | 584K |
Analyst Outlook
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EDU as "Buy", TAL as "Hold", GOTU as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, PRDO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.62% vs EDU's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.00 | $18.00 | $2.94 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 28 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | — | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +1.7% | +4.0% | +5.6% |
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LXEH vs EDU vs TAL vs GOTU vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.
5%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning GOTU is approximately -207% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 90% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 12.
0x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO?
In this comparison, PRDO (1.
6% yield), EDU (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LXEH or EDU or TAL or GOTU or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LXEH and EDU and TAL and GOTU and PRDO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LXEH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. EDU, PRDO pay a dividend while LXEH, TAL, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.