LXEH vs FEDU vs GOTU vs EDU vs TAL

For growth investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.

(FEDU) is the stronger pick with 100. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.

0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.

(FEDU) delivered a total return of -40. 8%, compared to -99. 9% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus LXEH's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lixiang Education Holding Co.

, Ltd. (LXEH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 92β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning GOTU is approximately -207% more volatile than LXEH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 90% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.

(FEDU) is pulling ahead at 100. 1% versus -35. 5% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. (LXEH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -75. 1% for Lixiang Education Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -79. 1% for LXEH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

(EDU) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.

In this comparison, FEDU (100.

0% yield), EDU (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LXEH, GOTU, TAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lixiang Education Holding Co.

, Ltd. (LXEH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LXEH: -99. 8%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LXEH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. FEDU, EDU pay a dividend while LXEH, GOTU, TAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.