Department Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Department Stores | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.50B | $2.96T | $1.04T | $136.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.62B | $742.78B | $703.06B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $642M | $90.80B | $22.91B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 50.6% | 24.9% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 11.5% | 4.1% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 35.3x | 44.7x | 57.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.20B | $152.99B | $67.09B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $86.81B | $10.73B | $1.53B |
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Macy's, Inc. (M) | 100 | 311.6 | +211.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 139.1 | +39.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
M carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.42, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.49x
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 57.5x)
- 3.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +78.8% vs SHOP's +12.4%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 5.0%
- PEG 1.26 vs WMT's 4.06
- 12.2% margin vs M's 2.8%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs SHOP's 2.64
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 30.1% revenue growth vs M's -1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs M's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 57.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs M's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.8% vs SHOP's +12.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs M's 4.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 8.7% |
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
M leads in 1 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • SHOP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMZN and SHOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 60.1x SHOP's $12.4B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to M's 2.8%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.6B | $742.8B | $703.1B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $155.9B | $42.8B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $642M | $90.8B | $22.9B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$2.5B | $15.3B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +50.6% | +24.9% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +11.5% | +4.1% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +12.2% | +3.3% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -0.3% | +2.2% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +16.6% | +5.8% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.2% | +74.8% | +35.1% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
M leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, M trades at a 92% valuation discount to SHOP's 112.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.37x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $2.96T | $1.04T | $136.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.5B | $3.02T | $1.09T | $135.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.54x | 38.35x | 47.65x | 112.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.06x | 35.26x | 44.67x | 57.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x | 4.33x | 3.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.92x | 20.74x | 24.83x | 90.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 4.12x | 1.45x | 11.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 7.24x | 10.44x | 10.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.21x | 384.26x | 24.94x | 68.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $11 for SHOP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to M's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), M scores 7/9 vs SHOP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +23.3% | +22.3% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +11.5% | +7.9% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +14.7% | +14.7% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +15.3% | +17.5% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $66.2B | $56.4B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $86.8B | $10.7B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $153.0B | $67.1B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.62x | 39.96x | 11.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,665 for SHOP. Over the past 12 months, M leads with a +78.8% total return vs SHOP's +12.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs M's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | +21.4% | +15.6% | -32.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.8% | +48.6% | +33.0% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +159.8% | +160.2% | +63.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | +66.3% | +185.3% | -3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | +715.9% | +505.0% | +3703.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.3% | +37.5% | +37.5% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs SHOP's 57.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.51x | 0.12x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.41 | $278.56 | $134.69 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.54 | $183.85 | $91.89 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +98.7% | +96.6% | +57.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 80.5 | 58.1 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 45.6M | 17.2M | 8.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — M and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: M as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.3% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs -3.1% for M (target: $19). For income investors, M offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.20 | $306.77 | $137.04 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 94 | 64 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | — | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 37 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | — | $0.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
M leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
M vs AMZN vs WMT vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Macy's, Inc. (M). Macy's, Inc. (M) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, Macy's, Inc.
(M) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Shopify Inc. at 112. 2x. On forward P/E, Macy's, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -3. 3% for Shopify Inc. (SHOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +37. 0% versus M's -22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 2157% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 107% for Macy's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -1. 7% for Macy's, Inc. (M). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 2. 8% for Macy's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Macy's, Inc. (M) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Shopify Inc. — 48. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 56. 3% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP?
In this comparison, M (3.
6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is M or AMZN or WMT or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, SHOP: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between M and AMZN and WMT and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (M (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: M is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. M, WMT pay a dividend while AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.