Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Entertainment
Entertainment
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $3.30B | $50.26B | $192.60B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655M | $7.53B | $97.26B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $887M | $11.22B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 79.0% | 37.2% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 15.4% | 15.5% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.4x | 16.5x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $645M | $1.49B | $44.88B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $2.86B | $5.70B | $9.03B |
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MANU is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.7% vs NFLX's -23.6%
EA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.18, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.05x
- Beta 0.18 vs MANU's 0.92, lower leverage
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 23.4x)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs EA's 217.6%
- PEG 0.75 vs EA's 5.69
- 15.9% revenue growth vs MANU's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs MANU's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 23.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs MANU's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs MANU's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs MANU's -0.5%, ROIC 29.8% vs -2.0% |
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
DIS leads 1 • EA leads 1 • MANU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 148.4x MANU's $655M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MANU's -1.4%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $655M | $7.5B | $97.3B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $1.2B | $20.5B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $887M | $11.2B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $2.3B | $7.1B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.8% | +79.0% | +37.2% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +15.4% | +15.5% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +11.8% | +11.5% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | +30.8% | +7.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +11.1% | +6.5% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +90.6% | -29.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 72% valuation discount to EA's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs EA's 13.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $50.3B | $192.6B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $48.9B | $231.8B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -74.04x | 57.22x | 15.87x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.38x | 16.53x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.93x | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.41x | 39.81x | 12.10x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.64x | 6.67x | 2.04x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.53x | 7.51x | 1.72x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 86.79x | 21.64x | 19.11x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MANU. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs MANU's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | +14.2% | +9.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +7.1% | +5.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +14.7% | +6.9% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +12.7% | +8.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.33x | 0.22x | 0.39x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | -$1.4B | $39.2B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $2.9B | $5.7B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $645M | $1.5B | $44.9B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | — | 9.95x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, MANU leads with a +32.7% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs MANU's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.2% | -1.6% | -2.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | +29.7% | +7.7% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | +61.5% | +8.0% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | +43.6% | -39.8% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +217.6% | +11.8% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +17.3% | +2.6% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MANU's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.18x | 0.90x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.65 | $204.89 | $124.69 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.22 | $141.19 | $92.19 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +98.0% | +87.2% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 35.1 | 64.4 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 307K | 1.8M | 9.1M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EA and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANU as "Hold", EA as "Hold", DIS as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). For income investors, DIS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.92% vs EA's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.95 | $172.65 | $139.50 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 66 | 63 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | +1.8% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MANU vs EA vs DIS vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Manchester United plc (MANU). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Walt Disney Company (DIS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Electronic Arts Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus DIS's +11. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Manchester United plc's 0. 92β — meaning MANU is approximately 400% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 0. 7% for Manchester United plc (MANU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -17. 0% for Electronic Arts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -5. 0% for Manchester United plc — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 8% for MANU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Electronic Arts Inc. 's 5. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield), EA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. MANU, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MANU or EA or DIS or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, MANU: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MANU and EA and DIS and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. DIS pays a dividend while MANU, EA, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.