MAR vs H

For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) a "Hold" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Marriott International, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to +114. 1% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +430. 3% versus H's +254. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Hyatt Hotels Corporation's 1. 39β — meaning H is approximately 28% more volatile than MAR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.

0% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -104. 3% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -0. 7% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAR leads at 15. 8% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAR leads at 21. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 22. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for H: 11. 9% to $190. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.

(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 8% yield, +430. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +430. 3%, H: +254. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; H is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MAR pays a dividend while H does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.