Travel Lodging
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAR vs WH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Lodging
MAR vs WH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $93.23B | $6.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.58B | $1.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.58B | $193M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 30.4x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $17.08B | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $358M | $64M |
MAR vs WH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Wyndham Hotels & Re… (WH) | 100 | 182.5 | +82.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAR vs WH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 13.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 430.3% 10Y total return vs WH's 43.8%
- 4.3% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5%
WH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 0.71x
- Beta 0.81, yield 2.0%, current ratio 0.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs WH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs MAR's 9.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs MAR's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MAR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.5% vs WH's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs WH's 4.5%, ROIC 25.0% vs 9.4% |
MAR vs WH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAR vs WH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.6B annually — 18.5x WH's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.4% (WH) to 9.7% (MAR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.6B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.5B | $478M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | $193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.1B | $304M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.9x trailing earnings, WH trades at a 8% valuation discount to MAR's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WH's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93.2B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $110.0B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.08x | 33.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.38x | 17.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.77x | 19.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.56x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 13.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.75x | 19.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs WH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +37.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.0% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.6% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 6.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.7B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $358M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.1B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.20x | 3.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $24,578 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,182 for WH. Over the past 12 months, MAR leads with a +38.5% total return vs WH's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAR at 26.4% vs WH's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +30.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.8% | +21.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +430.3% | +43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAR and WH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WH is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $380.00 | $92.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $250.79 | $69.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAR as "Hold" and WH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.0% upside for WH (target: $98) vs 5.9% for MAR (target: $373). For income investors, WH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.00% vs MAR's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $372.50 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.67 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +4.6% |
WH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MAR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MAR vs WH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAR or WH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the better valuation at 33. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAR or WH?
On trailing P/E, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the cheapest at 33. 9x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAR or WH?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to +21. 8% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +430. 3% versus WH's +43. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAR or WH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Marriott International, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning MAR is approximately 34% more volatile than WH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MAR or WH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus 1. 5% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAR leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAR or WH?
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 9. 9% for Marriott International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WH leads at 28. 4% versus 15. 8% for MAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WH leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAR or WH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(WH) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for Marriott International, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WH: 17. 0% to $98. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAR or WH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR).
09Is MAR or WH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 8% yield, +430. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAR: +430. 3%, WH: +43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAR and WH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.