Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.33B | $4.55B | $2.39B | $12.11B | $2.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $634M | $669M | $1.06B | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $-27M | $-609M | $-327M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 87.9% | 83.6% | 98.3% | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | 5.2% | -83.9% | -33.3% | -281.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $483M | $1.28B | $2.61B | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $214M | $434M | $372M | $295M |
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maze Therapeutics, … (MAZE) | 100 | 150.8 | +50.8% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 150.9 | +50.9% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 112.0 | +12.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAZE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 6.6%, current ratio 15.50x
FOLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -4.3% margin vs MAZE's -6.1%
- +134.8% vs RARE's -38.0%
- -3.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 5.3% vs -89.4%
RARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.43
IONS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 241.3% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 147.3%
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.42 vs BEAM's 2.18
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs MAZE's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -4.3% margin vs MAZE's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs BEAM's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.8% vs RARE's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 5.3% vs -89.4% |
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOLD leads in 1 of 6 categories
IONS leads 1 • RARE leads 1 • MAZE leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 52.9x MAZE's $20M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.3% (FOLD) to -6.1% (MAZE). On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $634M | $669M | $1.1B | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $40M | -$536M | $4.5B | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | -$27M | -$609M | -$327M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $30M | -$487M | -$971M | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +87.9% | +83.6% | +98.3% | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | +5.2% | -83.9% | -33.3% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -4.3% | -91.0% | -30.9% | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +4.7% | -72.8% | -91.8% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.7% | -2.4% | +87.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | -89.0% | -17.2% | +39.8% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FOLD and RARE and BEAM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $4.5B | $2.4B | $12.1B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $4.8B | $3.2B | $14.4B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.89x | -164.85x | -4.18x | -30.79x | -35.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.17x | 3.56x | 12.83x | 21.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 16.29x | — | 23.97x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MAZE and FOLD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. MAZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAZE scores 4/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.6% | -12.0% | -6.1% | -58.6% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.8% | -3.2% | -45.8% | -10.1% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.4% | +5.3% | -89.4% | -12.8% | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.1% | +5.1% | -46.4% | -14.1% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.76x | — | 5.35x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$166M | $269M | $842M | $2.2B | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $214M | $434M | $372M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $483M | $1.3B | $2.6B | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.24x | 1.00x | -14.49x | -3.64x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,367 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +134.8% total return vs RARE's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs RARE's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.5% | +1.5% | +3.2% | -8.0% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.5% | +134.8% | -38.0% | +105.7% | +66.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +11.6% | -52.6% | +76.0% | -12.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +35.2% | -76.3% | +93.9% | -68.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.8% | +147.3% | -59.4% | +241.3% | +54.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.7% | +3.7% | -22.0% | +20.7% | -4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOLD and IONS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MAZE's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.48x | 1.43x | 0.42x | 2.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $14.50 | $42.37 | $86.74 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.83 | $5.51 | $18.29 | $34.78 | $15.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.8% | +99.9% | +57.5% | +84.5% | +79.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 72.2 | 53.2 | 46.2 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 642K | 2.3M | 1.5M | 1.6M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
RARE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAZE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.0% upside for MAZE (target: $63) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.25 | $14.50 | $48.36 | $107.27 | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 24 | 33 | 32 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FOLD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IONS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MAZE vs FOLD vs RARE vs IONS vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). Analysts rate Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -76. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning BEAM is approximately 421% more volatile than IONS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -100. 0% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. (MAZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -40. 2% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM?
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -612. 7% for Maze Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 5. 4% versus -670. 3% for MAZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAZE: 163.
0% to $63. 25.
07Which pays a better dividend — MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is MAZE or FOLD or RARE or IONS or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +241. 3% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONS: +241. 3%, BEAM: +54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MAZE and FOLD and RARE and IONS and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAZE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.