Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $74M | $1.69B | $5.17B | $10.92B | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $55M | $410M | $622M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-47M | $-164M | $-799M | $-301M | $-223M |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 99.6% | -103.2% | 85.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -76.4% | -237.9% | -194.4% | -35.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $83M | $149M | $319M | $366M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $15M | $297M | $227M | $78M |
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seres Therapeutics,… (MCRB) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Mirum Pharmaceutica… (MIRM) | 100 | 610.9 | +510.9% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCRB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +8.2% vs RCKT's -45.2%
MIRM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 1.02
- Beta 1.02 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs MIRM's 6.8%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7%
- Better valuation composite
RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 6.38x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -48.4% margin vs MCRB's -40.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -18.1% ROA vs MIRM's -98.5%, ROIC 9.3% vs -5.0% |
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • MCRB leads 0 • MIRM leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $622M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -48.4% (ARWR) to -40.9% (MCRB). On growth, NKTR holds the edge at -25.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $55M | $410M | $622M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$83M | -$130M | -$778M | -$203M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$47M | -$164M | -$799M | -$301M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$42M | -$209M | -$173M | -$51M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +99.6% | -103.2% | +85.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -76.4% | -2.4% | -194.4% | -35.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.9% | -3.0% | -195.0% | -48.4% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.9% | -3.8% | -42.1% | -8.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% | -100.0% | -86.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -155.5% | -4.5% | -43.8% | -133.8% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ARWR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARWR's 90.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MIRM's 2461.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $1.7B | $5.2B | $10.9B | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $112M | $1.8B | $5.2B | $11.1B | $345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.06x | -8.57x | -219.00x | -6389.34x | -1.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2461.91x | 90.41x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 94.25x | 30.64x | 9.91x | 13.16x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 15.66x | 16.42x | 20.71x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 85.97x | — | 94.16x | 69.58x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR delivers a -55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-55 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCRB's 1.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCRB scores 7/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -127.3% | -4.0% | -2.9% | -55.5% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.5% | -62.8% | -98.5% | -18.1% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -90.3% | -57.2% | -5.0% | +9.3% | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.4% | -55.7% | -3.7% | +8.8% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.88x | 1.66x | 1.02x | 0.73x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37M | $134M | $23M | $140M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $15M | $297M | $227M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $83M | $149M | $319M | $366M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -4.74x | -0.03x | -1.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MIRM five years ago would be worth $55,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $186 for MCRB. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs MCRB's -58.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.0% | +92.0% | +31.8% | +15.0% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.9% | +818.2% | +149.7% | +496.9% | -45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +621.8% | +290.5% | +92.7% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -72.3% | +451.3% | +17.4% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -59.1% | +679.2% | +1253.3% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.9% | +93.3% | +57.5% | +24.4% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MIRM and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MIRM is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs MCRB's 25.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.85x | 1.02x | 1.81x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.98 | $109.00 | $112.00 | $79.48 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.53 | $7.99 | $40.00 | $12.44 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.8% | +76.5% | +91.9% | +98.1% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 53.4 | 73.5 | 69.7 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 991K | 833K | 1.9M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCRB as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", MIRM as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.3% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs -83.8% for MCRB (target: $1).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.25 | $132.83 | $120.40 | $81.22 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 33 | 18 | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MCRB vs NKTR vs MIRM vs ARWR vs RCKT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) delivered a total return of +451. 3%, compared to -98. 1% for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus MCRB's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 81% more volatile than MIRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 188% for Seres Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seres Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 103. 4% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, MIRM leads at 89. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT?
Seres Therapeutics, Inc.
(MCRB) is the more profitable company, earning 721. 9% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 721. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -119. 1% for MCRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MCRB or NKTR or MIRM or ARWR or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MIRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), +679. 2% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MIRM: +679. 2%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MCRB and NKTR and MIRM and ARWR and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MIRM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.