REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $184M | $1.62B | $7.39B | $979M | $527M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $263M | $864M | $192M | $453M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $120M | $244M | $93M | $-54M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 60.3% | 61.8% | 69.7% | 10.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.3% | 46.7% | 37.9% | 17.3% | 33.1% |
| Forward P/E | 211.4x | 13.5x | 38.4x | 7.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $269M | $394M | $3.29B | $646M | $4.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $48M | $15M | $18M | $183M |
MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modiv Industrial, I… (MDV) | 100 | 114.5 | +14.5% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| STAG Industrial, In… (STAG) | 100 | 100.0 | -0.0% |
| Plymouth Industrial… (PLYM) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MDV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 13.5%
- 436.4% 10Y total return vs STAG's 147.9%
- PEG 3.60 vs STAG's 18.83
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.4x), PEG 3.60 vs 18.83
STAG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.1%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8%
PLYM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.20, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.42x
- 48.5% margin vs ILPT's -11.9%
- Beta 0.20 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage
ILPT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +177.7% vs STAG's +19.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.1% FFO/revenue growth vs IIPR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 38.4x), PEG 3.60 vs 18.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.5% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs MDV's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs STAG's +19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 2.1% vs 2.2% |
MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ILPT leads 1 • MDV leads 0 • STAG leads 0 • PLYM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IIPR and PLYM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STAG is the larger business by revenue, generating $864M annually — 18.6x MDV's $46M. PLYM is the more profitable business, keeping 48.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, STAG holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $263M | $864M | $192M | $453M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $197M | $634M | $116M | $306M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $120M | $244M | $93M | -$54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $144M | $443M | $95M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +60.3% | +61.8% | +69.7% | +10.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +46.7% | +37.9% | +17.3% | +33.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +45.6% | +28.3% | +48.5% | -11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +54.7% | +51.2% | +49.4% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | -3.8% | +9.1% | -1.4% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -69.0% | -1.0% | -34.7% | -2.5% | +57.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IIPR and ILPT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.1x trailing earnings, PLYM trades at a 73% valuation discount to STAG's 26.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIPR offers better value at 3.85x vs STAG's 13.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $184M | $1.6B | $7.4B | $979M | $527M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $438M | $2.0B | $10.7B | $1.6B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.34x | 14.40x | 26.48x | 7.11x | -7.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 211.41x | 13.49x | 38.36x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.85x | 13.00x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.11x | 9.91x | 17.20x | 13.32x | 14.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.96x | 6.08x | 8.75x | 4.94x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.87x | 1.98x | 1.69x | 0.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.69x | 9.26x | 18.40x | 10.19x | 8.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLYM delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLYM scores 7/9 vs ILPT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | +6.4% | +6.8% | +16.8% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +5.1% | +3.5% | +5.9% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +4.3% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +5.8% | +4.9% | +2.8% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.21x | 0.90x | 1.10x | 4.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $254M | $346M | $3.3B | $628M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $48M | $15M | $18M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $269M | $394M | $3.3B | $646M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.03x | 6.67x | 3.04x | 0.97x | 0.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLYM five years ago would be worth $13,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,590 for MDV. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs STAG's +19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs IIPR's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.1% | +18.3% | +5.8% | +0.5% | +44.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +20.3% | +19.8% | +45.5% | +177.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.0% | +14.1% | +21.8% | +15.1% | +326.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | -50.0% | +26.4% | +38.5% | -62.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.1% | +436.4% | +147.9% | +68.9% | -41.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.3% | +4.5% | +6.8% | +4.8% | +62.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MDV and PLYM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLYM is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDV currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs IIPR's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.91x | 0.53x | 0.16x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $61.40 | $39.99 | $22.74 | $8.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.97 | $44.58 | $33.19 | $14.05 | $2.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +92.2% | +96.7% | +96.7% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.2 | 59.3 | 51.5 | 56.8 | 71.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 303K | 1.2M | 132K | 312K |
Analyst Outlook
IIPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MDV as "Buy", IIPR as "Hold", STAG as "Buy", PLYM as "Hold", ILPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for IIPR (target: $85) vs -6.4% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, IIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.46% vs ILPT's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $84.67 | $40.25 | $21.00 | $7.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 11 | 21 | 16 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +13.5% | +3.9% | +4.4% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $7.62 | $1.51 | $0.97 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). ILPT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MDV vs IIPR vs STAG vs PLYM vs ILPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the stronger pick with 10. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) offers the better valuation at 7. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Modiv Industrial, Inc. (MDV) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
On trailing P/E, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.
(PLYM) is the cheapest at 7. 1x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. at 26. 5x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. wins at 3. 60x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 83x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
Over the past 5 years, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.
(PLYM) delivered a total return of +38. 5%, compared to -64. 1% for Modiv Industrial, Inc. (MDV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +439. 9% versus MDV's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.
(PLYM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 53β — meaning ILPT is approximately 839% more volatile than PLYM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is pulling ahead at 10. 1% versus -13. 8% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. grew EPS 1445% year-over-year, compared to -247. 6% for Modiv Industrial, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLYM leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.
(PLYM) is the more profitable company, earning 70. 2% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 70. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus 18. 2% for PLYM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 60x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 211. 4x for Modiv Industrial, Inc. — 197. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IIPR: 49. 6% to $84. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT).
09Is MDV or IIPR or STAG or PLYM or ILPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.
(PLYM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 4. 4% yield). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLYM: +68. 9%, ILPT: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MDV and IIPR and STAG and PLYM and ILPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MDV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLYM is a small-cap deep-value stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.