Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Medical - Equipment & Services
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $12.11B | $9.51B | $8.76B | $1.27B | $7.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.68B | $8.10B | $4.03B | $1.08B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $460M | $599M | $-185M | $65M | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 26.9% | 31.9% | 25.5% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | 12.2% | 11.8% | 8.4% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 10.7x | 16.0x | 21.7x | 58.3x |
| Total Debt | $250M | $3.60B | $3.07B | $435M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $497M | $539M | $214M | $36M | $229M |
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 456.8 | +356.8% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| ProAssurance Corpor… (PRA) | 100 | 179.0 | +79.0% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 284.6 | +184.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 188.5%
- PEG 0.78 vs ICLR's 1.53
- 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- +41.0% vs HIMS's -45.0%
ICLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 58.3x)
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.44
PRA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.2%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.05 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs PRA's -2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs PRA's -2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.0% vs HIMS's -45.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs CRL's -2.5%, ROIC 154.9% vs 6.3% |
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • PRA leads 1 • CRL leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 7.5x PRA's $1.1B. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $8.1B | $4.0B | $1.1B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $577M | $1.4B | $824M | $101M | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $460M | $599M | -$185M | $65M | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $745M | $996M | $391M | -$17M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +26.9% | +31.9% | +25.5% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +12.2% | +11.8% | +8.4% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +7.4% | -4.6% | +6.0% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.8% | +12.3% | +9.7% | -1.6% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | +0.6% | +1.2% | -2.0% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.6% | -98.7% | -160.0% | +2.5% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 76% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MEDP offers better value at 0.87x vs ICLR's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.1B | $9.5B | $8.8B | $1.3B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $12.6B | $11.6B | $1.7B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.75x | 13.06x | -61.04x | 24.95x | 55.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.96x | 10.73x | 16.00x | 21.73x | 58.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.87x | 1.86x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.07x | 7.92x | 12.75x | 19.51x | 46.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.79x | 1.15x | 2.18x | 1.16x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.27x | 1.09x | 2.74x | 0.95x | 13.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.76x | 8.50x | 16.90x | — | 98.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. PRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs PRA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +120.9% | +6.3% | -5.7% | +5.0% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.8% | +3.6% | -2.5% | +1.2% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +154.9% | +6.5% | +6.3% | +3.2% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +65.7% | +7.8% | +8.1% | +4.0% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.38x | 0.95x | 0.32x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$247M | $3.1B | $2.9B | $399M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $497M | $539M | $214M | $36M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250M | $3.6B | $3.1B | $435M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.96x | 4.29x | 4.53x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,336 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +41.0% total return vs HIMS's -45.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 33.6% vs ICLR's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.7% | -34.0% | -12.3% | +2.8% | -15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.0% | -10.1% | +25.7% | +7.8% | -45.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.4% | -34.4% | -6.5% | +32.4% | +138.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.0% | -44.8% | -46.6% | +0.2% | +173.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1425.7% | +90.2% | +114.0% | -18.6% | +188.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.5% | -13.1% | -2.2% | +9.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRA currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 40.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.64x | 1.44x | 0.05x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $628.92 | $211.00 | $228.88 | $24.85 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $284.48 | $66.57 | $132.58 | $22.72 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.4% | +59.0% | +77.6% | +99.4% | +40.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 62.8 | 57.4 | 49.1 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 371K | 1.1M | 792K | 798K | 34.8M |
Analyst Outlook
CRL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MEDP as "Hold", ICLR as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", PRA as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for ICLR (target: $152) vs -25.8% for PRA (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $498.86 | $152.13 | $206.43 | $18.33 | $26.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 30 | 36 | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.6% | +5.3% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
MEDP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MEDP vs ICLR vs CRL vs PRA vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for ProAssurance Corporation (PRA). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Medpace Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -46. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1426% versus PRA's -18. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 4934% more volatile than PRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 7% for ProAssurance Corporation (PRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ICON Public Limited Company grew EPS 28. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 5. 2% for HIMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 47. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICLR: 22. 2% to $152. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MEDP or ICLR or CRL or PRA or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRA: -18. 6%, HIMS: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEDP and ICLR and CRL and PRA and HIMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MEDP (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and PRA (Financial Services) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.