Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MEG
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$798M
5Y Perf.+1.5%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+80.1%
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.04B
5Y Perf.+424.6%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+43.0%

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MEG logoMEG
PESI logoPESI
CLH logoCLH
CWST logoCWST
IndustryWaste ManagementWaste ManagementWaste ManagementWaste Management
Market Cap$798M$207M$15.04B$5.35B
Revenue (TTM)$821M$59M$6.06B$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$-18M$395M$7M
Gross Margin39.0%4.1%30.0%17.4%
Operating Margin2.0%-26.3%11.2%4.5%
Forward P/E172.3x33.4x63.9x
Total Debt$359M$4M$3.45B$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$12M$826M$124M

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MEG
PESI
CLH
CWST
StockJul 20May 26Return
Montrose Environmen… (MEG)100101.5+1.5%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100180.1+80.1%
Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH)100524.6+424.6%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100143.0+43.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEG and CLH are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Clean Harbors, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CWST also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MEG
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

MEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.1%
  • 19.3% revenue growth vs CLH's 2.4%
  • 0.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +46.6% vs CWST's -28.9%
Best for: growth exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Secondary Option

PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CLH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • 496.4% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
  • Beta 0.70, current ratio 2.33x
  • Lower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x)
  • 6.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
  • Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMEG logoMEG19.3% revenue growth vs CLH's 2.4%
ValueCLH logoCLHLower P/E (33.4x vs 63.9x)
Quality / MarginsCLH logoCLH6.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85
DividendsMEG logoMEG0.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MEG logoMEG+46.6% vs CWST's -28.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CLH logoCLH5.2% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 9.8% vs -21.7%

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MEGMontrose Environmental Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Assessment Permitting And Response
37.0%$307M
Remediation And Reuse
33.4%$277M
Measurement And Analysis
29.6%$246M
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLHClean Harbors, Inc.
FY 2025
Technical Services
30.8%$1.9B
Industrial Services And Other
22.0%$1.3B
Safetly-Kleen Environmental Services
21.8%$1.3B
Field and Emergency Response
15.5%$937M
Safety-Kleen Oil
9.8%$594M
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEGLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 102.9x PESI's $59M. CLH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$821M$59M$6.1B$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$67M-$14M$1.1B$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M-$18M$395M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$72M-$14M$467M$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.0%+4.1%+30.0%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.0%-26.3%+11.2%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.7%-30.1%+6.5%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.7%-23.4%+7.7%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.2%-20.1%+1.9%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.3%-110.5%+9.2%-18.6%
MEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 38.7x trailing earnings, CLH trades at a 95% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLH's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEG's 18.0x.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$798M$207M$15.0B$5.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$200M$17.7B$6.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-157.64x-14.89x38.74x712.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.172.29x33.43x63.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.04x15.73x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.96x3.36x2.49x2.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.72x4.11x5.48x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.76x34.04x63.17x
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLH delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLH's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.3%-34.5%+14.4%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%-20.2%+5.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.3%-21.7%+9.8%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.5%-16.7%+10.6%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94554
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x0.09x1.26x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$348M-$7M$2.6B$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$12M$826M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$359M$4M$3.4B$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.67x-42.14x6.34x1.12x
CLH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLH five years ago would be worth $29,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,853 for MEG. Over the past 12 months, MEG leads with a +46.6% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLH at 27.3% vs MEG's -10.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.3%-8.8%+15.9%-13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+46.6%+26.2%+26.7%-28.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.2%+21.7%+106.2%-6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.5%+45.6%+198.8%+25.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.4%+178.6%+496.4%+1059.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.1%+6.8%+27.3%-2.2%
CLH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLH and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLH currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs PESI's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.82x1.85x0.70x0.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.00$16.50$316.98$121.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.92$8.02$201.34$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.0%+67.7%+89.0%+70.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.841.537.952.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded332K164K504K874K
Evenly matched — CLH and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MEG as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", CLH as "Buy", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 123.5% upside for MEG (target: $49) vs 6.1% for CLH (target: $299). MEG is the only dividend payer here at 0.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMEG logoMEGMontrose Environm…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLH logoCLHClean Harbors, In…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.33$18.00$299.33$119.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1212719
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0101
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+15.3%0.0%+1.7%0.0%
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MEG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMontrose Environmental Grou… (MEG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MEG vs PESI vs CLH vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.

(MEG) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

On trailing P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the cheapest at 38. 7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Clean Harbors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) delivered a total return of +198. 8%, compared to -61. 5% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus MEG's -1. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 472% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 126% for Clean Harbors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.

(MEG) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus 2. 4% for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. grew EPS 93. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEG leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) trades at 33. 4x forward P/E versus 172. 3x for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — 138. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEG: 123. 5% to $49. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST?

In this comparison, MEG (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. PESI, CLH, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MEG or PESI or CLH or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MEG and PESI and CLH and CWST?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MEG is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. MEG pays a dividend while PESI, CLH, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MEG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MEG and PESI and CLH and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MEG: -5.2% · PESI: -20.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.