Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Insurance - Brokers | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $6M | $791K | $17M | $6M | $628M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $1.34B | $66M | $4M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $18M | $-43M | $-5M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | -26.3% | 28.8% | 23.0% | 10.7% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | -80.0% | 0.1% | -86.5% | -8.9% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.9x | — | — | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $91M | $34M | $2M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $233M | $99M | $2M | $394M |
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magic Empire Global… (MEGL) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Huize Holding Limit… (HUIZ) | 100 | 34.7 | -65.3% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 170.6 | +70.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MEGL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 36.88x
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 36.88x
HUIZ has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and efficiency.
- Beta 0.32 vs FTFT's 2.54
- 2.0% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC -5.0% vs -97.5%
Among these 5 stocks, RCON doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FTFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs MEGL's -7.3%
- -16.1% vs RCON's -49.1%
TIGR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- -39.9% 10Y total return vs HUIZ's -96.9%
- Better valuation composite
- 15.5% margin vs FTFT's -120.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.5% revenue growth vs MEGL's -7.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.5% margin vs FTFT's -120.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs FTFT's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -16.1% vs RCON's -49.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC -5.0% vs -97.5% |
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories
HUIZ leads 1 • MEGL leads 1 • RCON leads 0 • FTFT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUIZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 348.9x FTFT's $4M. TIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $1.3B | $66M | $4M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $4M | -$54M | -$34M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $18M | -$43M | -$5M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $0 | -$44M | $56.6B | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | +28.8% | +23.0% | +10.7% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.0% | +0.1% | -86.5% | -8.9% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.0% | +1.4% | -64.3% | -120.6% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | -1.9% | -65.9% | +14767.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.2% | +2.6% | +110.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +3.3% | +35.7% | +100.0% | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HUIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $790,764 | $17M | $6M | $628M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$10M | -$20M | $7M | $6M | $414M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.77x | -8.29x | -1.22x | -0.54x | 17.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.91x | — | — | 6.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -8.95x | — | — | 2.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 0.00x | 1.72x | 1.65x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.01x | 0.11x | 0.06x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 0.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-16 for FTFT. MEGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs HUIZ's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.0% | +4.2% | -9.2% | -16.4% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | +2.0% | -8.0% | -11.9% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | -5.0% | -10.6% | -97.5% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | -4.1% | -11.8% | -117.5% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.21x | 0.08x | 0.04x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | -$142M | -$64M | -$457,223 | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $233M | $99M | $2M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $91M | $34M | $2M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.88x | — | -372.30x | -228.78x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $31 for MEGL. Over the past 12 months, FTFT leads with a -16.1% total return vs RCON's -49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 30.4% vs FTFT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.5% | -42.2% | -45.8% | +66.7% | -38.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.5% | -24.3% | -49.1% | -16.1% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.0% | -74.0% | -88.7% | -90.2% | +121.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -95.3% | -99.4% | -99.3% | -62.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -96.9% | -99.3% | -98.8% | -39.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.3% | -36.2% | -51.6% | -53.9% | +30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUIZ and TIGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUIZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIGR currently trades 47.5% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.32x | 0.47x | 2.54x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.62 | $4.53 | $7.16 | $4.03 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $1.19 | $0.75 | $0.56 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.3% | +34.4% | +11.7% | +31.0% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 54.4 | 42.5 | 46.4 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 292K | 90K | 108K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
MEGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUIZ as "Hold", TIGR as "Sell".
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MEGL vs HUIZ vs RCON vs FTFT vs TIGR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
On forward P/E, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -62. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -39. 9% versus MEGL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 693% more volatile than HUIZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -7. 3% for Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -873. 8% for Magic Empire Global Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCON leads at -7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TIGR leads at 35. 6% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 9x for Huize Holding Limited — 27. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MEGL or HUIZ or RCON or FTFT or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32)). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUIZ: -96. 9%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MEGL and HUIZ and RCON and FTFT and TIGR?
These companies operate in different sectors (MEGL (Financial Services) and HUIZ (Financial Services) and RCON (Energy) and FTFT (Technology) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MEGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUIZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.