REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.57B | $3.23B | $74M | $357M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418M | $1.54B | $132M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $177M | $104M | $-40M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | 116.7% | 62.6% | 47.3% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 63.3% | 58.3% | -4.3% | -50.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | 12.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $10.99B | $16.16B | $1.17B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $453M | $66M | $248M |
MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFA Financial, Inc.… (MFAN) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 0.54, yield 7.1%, current ratio 2.18x
- 42.2% margin vs RC's -45.8%
BXMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 50.5% 10Y total return vs MFAN's 20.2%
- Better valuation composite
- +12.1% vs RC's -44.9%
GPMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.2% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RC's 31.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.1% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 1.2% |
MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFAN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BXMT leads 2 • GPMT leads 0 • RC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 11.7x GPMT's $132M. MFAN is the more profitable business, keeping 42.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418M | $1.5B | $132M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $948M | -$8M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $177M | $104M | -$40M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $76M | $335M | $463,000 | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +116.7% | +62.6% | +47.3% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +58.3% | -4.3% | -50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | +6.7% | -30.5% | -45.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +21.8% | +0.4% | +60.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +111.3% | +4.0% | +157.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.0% | — | +40.9% | +24.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BXMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, MFAN trades at a 50% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXMT's 16.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $3.2B | $74M | $357M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $18.9B | $1.2B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.97x | 29.92x | -1.34x | -1.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.45x | 11.98x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.34x | 16.35x | 20.75x | 48.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | 2.12x | 0.51x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.93x | 0.13x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.68x | 11.71x | 27.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MFAN and GPMT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFAN delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. GPMT carries lower financial leverage with a 2.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MFAN's 6.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs RC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +2.9% | -7.1% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.5% | -2.3% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.3% | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +11.3% | +4.6% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.01x | 4.61x | 2.12x | 3.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.8B | $15.7B | $1.1B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $453M | $66M | $248M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.0B | $16.2B | $1.2B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.34x | 1.11x | 0.58x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MFAN five years ago would be worth $12,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, BXMT leads with a +12.1% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | +0.7% | -32.5% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | +12.1% | -19.7% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +48.1% | -34.3% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -4.1% | -65.3% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +50.5% | -50.0% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | +14.0% | -13.1% | -23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MFAN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MFAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFAN currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.74x | 1.44x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.50 | $20.67 | $3.12 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.60 | $17.67 | $1.24 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +92.6% | +49.7% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 47.5 | 49.4 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 1.4M | 154K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFAN and RC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BXMT as "Hold", GPMT as "Hold", RC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 15.7% for RC (target: $3). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs MFAN's 7.12%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | +9.9% | +14.0% | +31.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $1.89 | $0.22 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.4% | +7.6% | +18.9% |
MFAN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BXMT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MFAN vs BXMT vs GPMT vs RC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14.
0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
Over the past 5 years, MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) delivered a total return of +20. 2%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 5% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 167% more volatile than MFAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -14.
0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to 45. 2% for Ready Capital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFAN leads at 78. 8% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFAN leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 4x for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 7. 1% for MFA Financial, Inc. 8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN).
09Is MFAN or BXMT or GPMT or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
8. 875% Senior Notes (MFAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFAN: +20. 2%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MFAN and BXMT and GPMT and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MFAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.