Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Regional
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $225M | $115M | $4.30B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $353M | $58M | $3.15B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $11M | $327M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 96.7% | 60.3% | 50.1% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 23.6% | 23.5% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 11.3x | 10.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $316M | $49M | $4.56B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $7M | $72M | $185M |
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1219.1 | +1119.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive and bank quality.
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- NIM 7.3% vs NBTB's 3.1%
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.8x)
MGYR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.28 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage
ENVA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +87.8% vs MFIN's +8.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs ENVA's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs MFIN's +8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENVA leads 2 • MGYR leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 53.9x MGYR's $58M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVA's 9.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $353M | $58M | $3.2B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $16M | $815M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $11M | $327M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $11M | $1.9B | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.7% | +60.3% | +50.1% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +23.6% | +23.5% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +16.7% | +9.8% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +16.8% | +56.2% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +51.5% | +28.6% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 64% valuation discount to ENVA's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $115M | $4.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $340M | $156M | $8.8B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.37x | 11.33x | 14.90x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.97x | — | 10.49x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.90x | 10.61x | 11.26x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.96x | 1.37x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 0.93x | 3.40x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.78x | 11.67x | 2.43x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $9 for MGYR. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENVA's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs ENVA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +9.2% | +24.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.1% | +5.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.2% | +6.7% | +10.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +2.4% | +13.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 0.41x | 3.41x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $115M | $42M | $4.5B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $7M | $72M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $316M | $49M | $4.6B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 0.66x | 79.01x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,317 for MFIN. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +87.8% total return vs MFIN's +8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +1.9% | +6.5% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.2% | +25.7% | +87.8% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +85.6% | +302.0% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +73.1% | +368.1% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.3% | +125.8% | +2034.9% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +22.9% | +59.0% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGYR and ENVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs MFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.28x | 1.48x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $20.00 | $176.68 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $14.35 | $89.00 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +88.4% | +97.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 47.4 | 65.4 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 6K | 227K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFIN and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MFIN as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for ENVA (target: $200) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.73% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $199.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.7% | +1.7% | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.45 | $0.29 | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.7% | +5.0% | +0.4% |
MFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ENVA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MFIN vs MGYR vs ENVA vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Enova International, Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to +23. 2% for Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus MFIN's +60. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 427% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Enova International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enova International, Inc. grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 9. 8% for Enova International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 23. 5% for ENVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVA: 15. 7% to $199. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), MGYR (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ENVA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MFIN or MGYR or ENVA or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, ENVA: +20. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MFIN and MGYR and ENVA and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. MFIN, MGYR, NBTB pay a dividend while ENVA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.