Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MGN
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • MY
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-49.5%
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$336K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204M
5Y Perf.+96.2%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$27M
5Y Perf.-49.2%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.32B
5Y Perf.+66.6%

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MGN logoMGN
RETO logoRETO
PESI logoPESI
CLPS logoCLPS
CWST logoCWST
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionConstruction MaterialsWaste ManagementInformation Technology ServicesWaste Management
Market Cap$3M$336K$204M$27M$5.32B
Revenue (TTM)$85M$9M$59M$299M$1.88B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$-25M$-18M$-4M$7M
Gross Margin16.8%14.0%4.1%22.8%17.4%
Operating Margin11.7%-237.8%-26.3%-1.4%4.5%
Forward P/E1.3x62.3x
Total Debt$388K$110K$4M$34M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$671K$12M$28M$124M

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MGN
RETO
PESI
CLPS
CWST
StockMay 20May 26Return
ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO)1000.0-100.0%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100196.2+96.2%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10050.8-49.2%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100166.6+66.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MGN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. PESI and CWST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MGN
Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Value Play

MGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (1.3x vs 62.3x)
  • 9.7% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
  • 16.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 37.1% vs -14.5%
Best for: value and quality
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RETO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PESI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +16.1% vs MGN's -96.7%
Best for: momentum
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 13.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19, yield 13.9%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.19 vs MGN's 2.57
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
  • 10.9% 10Y total return vs PESI's 194.9%
  • 18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWST logoCWST18.0% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5%
ValueMGN logoMGNLower P/E (1.3x vs 62.3x)
Quality / MarginsMGN logoMGN9.7% margin vs RETO's -291.9%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs MGN's 2.57
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS13.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PESI logoPESI+16.1% vs MGN's -96.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MGN logoMGN16.0% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC 37.1% vs -14.5%

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MGNMegan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

RETOReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Equipment
100.0%$652,906
PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMGNLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — MGN and RETO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 216.8x RETO's $9M. MGN is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RETO's -2.9%. On growth, RETO holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$85M$9M$59M$299M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$14M-$1M$414M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$18M-$4M$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$18M$0$102M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+16.8%+14.0%+4.1%+22.8%+17.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.7%-2.4%-26.3%-1.4%+4.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.7%-2.9%-30.1%-1.3%+0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-25.2%-77.8%-29.9%-2.3%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+49.0%-20.1%+15.3%+9.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.8%-110.5%+75.8%-18.6%
Evenly matched — MGN and RETO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MGN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 1.3x trailing earnings, MGN trades at a 100% valuation discount to CWST's 707.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGN's 0.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWST's 15.7x.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Market CapShares × price$3M$335,867$204M$27M$5.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2M-$225,888$196M$32M$6.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.34x-0.04x-14.63x-3.65x707.33x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.62.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.65x15.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x0.18x3.30x0.16x2.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.37x0.01x4.04x0.45x3.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF62.75x
MGN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGN delivers a 32.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. RETO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGN scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+32.3%-183.4%-34.5%-6.1%+0.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.0%-75.1%-20.2%-3.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+37.1%-14.5%-21.7%-7.9%+2.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+38.6%-21.6%-16.7%-9.8%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.00x0.09x0.59x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$561,755-$7M$6M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$671,355$12M$28M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$388,113$109,600$4M$34M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6460.27x-31.78x-42.14x1.12x
MGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $15,279 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for RETO. Over the past 12 months, PESI leads with a +16.1% total return vs MGN's -96.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 2.4% vs RETO's -92.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-90.4%-68.0%-10.4%-5.9%-14.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.7%-96.3%+16.1%-6.9%-25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%-99.9%+7.3%+4.4%-10.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%-100.0%+52.8%-67.1%+29.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%-100.0%+194.9%-77.7%+1088.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-67.9%-92.0%+2.4%+1.5%-3.5%
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGN's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.9% from its 52-week high vs MGN's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.57x1.75x1.74x0.19x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.63$19.55$16.50$1.88$119.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.13$0.48$8.02$0.80$74.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.9%+3.1%+66.5%+50.5%+70.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.942.634.347.749.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14.3M901K167K15K843K
Evenly matched — CLPS and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 32.3% for CWST (target: $112). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 13.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMGN logoMGNMegan Holdings Li…RETO logoRETOReTo Eco-Solution…PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$112.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMegan Holdings Limited Ordi… (MGN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MGN vs RETO vs PESI vs CLPS vs CWST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

On trailing P/E, Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) is the cheapest at 1.

3x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 707. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

(PESI) delivered a total return of +52. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1089% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 57β — meaning MGN is approximately 1221% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -43. 5% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

7% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGN leads at 11. 7% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 64.

1% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST?

In this comparison, CLPS (13.

9% yield) pays a dividend. MGN, RETO, PESI, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MGN or RETO or PESI or CLPS or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1089% 10Y return). Megan Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (MGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1089%, MGN: -96. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MGN and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST?

These companies operate in different sectors (MGN (Industrials) and RETO (Basic Materials) and PESI (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RETO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while MGN, RETO, PESI, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MGN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RETO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MGN and RETO and PESI and CLPS and CWST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MGN: 17.9% · RETO: 49.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.