Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $6M | $18.86B | $9.14B | $4.83B | $3.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $59M | $501M | $647M | $907M | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $402M | $-867M | $-1.31B | $-261M |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 68.3% | -15.6% | -47.7% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | -52.6% | 3.5% | -61.8% | -90.6% | -26.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 139.2x | — | — | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $25M | $964M | $280M | $3.65B | $824M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $565M | $234M | $547M | $43M |
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mawson Infrastructu… (MIGI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| IREN Limited (IREN) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIGI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IREN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 167.7%, EPS growth 234.5%
- 132.5% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.97, Low D/E 53.1%, current ratio 4.29x
- Beta 2.97, current ratio 4.29x
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
Among these 5 stocks, MARA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLSK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.7% NII/revenue growth vs MIGI's 36.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.97 vs MIGI's 4.10 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs MIGI's -46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs MIGI's -24.1%, ROIC 0.7% vs -62.9% |
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IREN leads in 3 of 6 categories
MIGI leads 0 • RIOT leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • CLSK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 15.3x MIGI's $59M. IREN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $59M | $501M | $647M | $907M | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $172M | -$450M | $627M | $181M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $402M | -$867M | -$1.3B | -$261M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$260M | -$1.0B | -$312M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +68.3% | -15.6% | -47.7% | +41.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.6% | +3.5% | -61.8% | -90.6% | -26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.8% | +17.4% | -102.4% | -144.6% | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -2.2% | -119.6% | -34.4% | -133.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +11.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.5% | -7.1% | -60.0% | -4.8% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIGI and RIOT and MARA and CLSK each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 91% valuation discount to IREN's 145.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IREN's 97.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $18.9B | $9.1B | $4.8B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $19.3B | $9.2B | $7.9B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.12x | 145.77x | -12.36x | -3.44x | 12.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 139.17x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 97.06x | — | — | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 37.64x | 14.12x | 5.32x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.98x | 2.87x | 1.30x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.47x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IREN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IREN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for MIGI. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IREN scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.4% | +18.6% | -28.8% | -30.5% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.1% | +9.9% | -21.5% | -17.1% | -8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.9% | +0.7% | -8.7% | -9.0% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.0% | +0.9% | -11.0% | -12.1% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.53x | 0.10x | 1.05x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $400M | $46M | $3.1B | $781M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $565M | $234M | $547M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $25M | $964M | $280M | $3.6B | $824M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.77x | 16.60x | -16.47x | 4.73x | -18.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IREN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IREN five years ago would be worth $23,252 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $50 for MIGI. Over the past 12 months, IREN leads with a +765.3% total return vs MIGI's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IREN at 158.8% vs MIGI's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +33.1% | +70.3% | +28.2% | +21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.1% | +765.3% | +207.5% | -4.7% | +74.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | +1633.2% | +129.8% | +36.1% | +229.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +132.5% | -27.8% | -59.5% | -26.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +132.5% | +787.3% | -51.6% | -84.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +158.8% | +32.0% | +10.8% | +48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IREN and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IREN is the less volatile stock with a 2.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIGI's 4.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MIGI's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.10x | 2.97x | 3.87x | 3.11x | 3.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.00 | $76.87 | $24.14 | $23.45 | $23.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.70 | $6.36 | $7.68 | $6.66 | $7.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +74.0% | +99.9% | +54.2% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 71.3 | 74.5 | 69.6 | 71.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666K | 34.5M | 18.4M | 47.6M | 19.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IREN as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.57 | $27.90 | $16.13 | $20.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 18 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 2 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +1.0% | +4.1% |
IREN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
MIGI vs IREN vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IREN Limited (IREN) is the stronger pick with 167.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 36. 0% for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IREN Limited (IREN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus IREN Limited at 145. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
Over the past 5 years, IREN Limited (IREN) delivered a total return of +132.
5%, compared to -99. 5% for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus MIGI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IREN Limited (IREN) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
97β versus Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. 's 4. 10β — meaning MIGI is approximately 38% more volatile than IREN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IREN Limited (IREN) is pulling ahead at 167.
7% versus 36. 0% for Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IREN leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 44.
6% to $20. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MIGI, IREN, RIOT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIGI or IREN or RIOT or MARA or CLSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.
(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). Mawson Infrastructure Group, Inc. (MIGI) carries a higher beta of 4. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, MIGI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIGI and IREN and RIOT and MARA and CLSK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MIGI (Financial Services) and IREN (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.