REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MITN vs KREF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
MITN vs KREF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $802M | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $400M | $442M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 93.7% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | 92.9% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 23.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $8.10B | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $85M |
MITN vs KREF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITN) | 100 | 101.1 | +1.1% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MITN vs KREF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MITN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth -28.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- 22.3% 10Y total return vs KREF's -9.1%
KREF is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.87, yield 15.2%, current ratio 0.32x
- Better valuation composite
- 15.2% yield, vs MITN's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% FFO/revenue growth vs KREF's -22.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs KREF's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 15.2% yield, vs MITN's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.3% vs KREF's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 3.4% |
MITN vs KREF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MITN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KREF and MITN operate at a comparable scale, with $442M and $400M in trailing revenue. MITN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, MITN holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $400M | $442M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $373M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.7% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +92.9% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -23.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.4% | -13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KREF's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MITN's 18.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $802M | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.73x | -6.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.64x | 18.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.70x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.58x | 6.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MITN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MITN delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. KREF carries lower financial leverage with a 3.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITN's 14.45x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 14.45x | 3.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MITN five years ago would be worth $12,226 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,436 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, MITN leads with a +10.3% total return vs KREF's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITN at 6.9% vs KREF's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | -16.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | -0.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | -35.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | -9.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | -0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MITN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MITN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KREF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MITN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs KREF's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.25 | $9.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.95 | $5.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.3% | +65.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KREF leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, KREF offers the higher dividend yield at 15.21% vs MITN's 3.12%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +15.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.3% |
MITN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KREF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
MITN vs KREF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MITN or KREF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) is the stronger pick with 14. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9. 500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) offers the better valuation at 28. 7x trailing P/E (23. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MITN or KREF?
Over the past 5 years, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) delivered a total return of +22. 3%, compared to -35. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MITN returned +22. 3% versus KREF's -9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MITN or KREF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KREF is approximately 66% more volatile than MITN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9. 500% Senior Notes due 2029 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MITN or KREF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) is pulling ahead at 14. 4% versus -22. 7% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9. 500% Senior Notes due 2029 grew EPS -28. 5% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MITN leads at 1194% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MITN or KREF?
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 3% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITN leads at 95. 3% versus 59. 3% for KREF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MITN leads at 92. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MITN or KREF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF) offers the highest yield at 15. 2%, versus 3. 1% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9. 500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN).
07Is MITN or KREF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc 9.
500% Senior Notes due 2029 (MITN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MITN: +22. 3%, KREF: -9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MITN and KREF?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.