Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Semiconductors
Software - Infrastructure
Semiconductors
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $122M | $1.66B | $10.04B | $1.47B | $230.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $561M | $4.04B | $318M | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $31M | $361M | $29M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 45.1% | 41.1% | 47.7% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -141.3% | 2.7% | 9.4% | -6.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.7x | 13.4x | 19.8x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $7M | $1.20B | $5M | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $543K | $146M | $1.16B | $653M | $7.84B |
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 251.7 | +151.7% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Tuya Inc. (TUYA) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKDW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.69 vs TUYA's 1.76
Among these 5 stocks, ARLO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.30, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.4x)
TUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 107.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs MKDW's -45.5%
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 382.4% 10Y total return vs ARLO's -31.0%
- 22.3% margin vs MKDW's -126.0%
- +53.4% vs MKDW's -26.4%
- 18.4% ROA vs MKDW's -27.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -51.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs MKDW's -45.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs MKDW's -126.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs TUYA's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs MKDW's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs MKDW's -27.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -51.5% |
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 1 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • ARLO leads 1 • MKDW leads 0 • TUYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 22255.0x MKDW's $2M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKDW's -126.0%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $561M | $4.0B | $318M | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $18M | $842M | -$21M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $31M | $361M | $29M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $64M | $697M | $0 | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +45.1% | +41.1% | +47.7% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -141.3% | +2.7% | +9.4% | -6.7% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -126.0% | +5.5% | +8.9% | +9.1% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -157.4% | +11.5% | +17.2% | +25.5% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.3% | -1.0% | +9.3% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -44.2% | — | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 93% valuation discount to TUYA's 291.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 152.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $122M | $1.7B | $10.0B | $1.5B | $230.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $130M | $1.5B | $10.1B | $817M | $239.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -48.60x | 108.93x | 21.68x | 291.76x | 43.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.71x | 13.39x | 19.84x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 21.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 152.16x | 10.47x | — | 17.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 61.23x | 3.14x | 2.46x | 4.91x | 5.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 13.14x | 1.80x | 1.45x | 11.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.84x | 9.08x | 19.23x | 18.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TUYA and QCOM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $3 for TUYA. TUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs MKDW's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.9% | +6.3% | +2.9% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.9% | +9.1% | +4.6% | +2.6% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -51.5% | +35.9% | +6.3% | -8.5% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +4.7% | +7.0% | -4.8% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.21x | 0.00x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$140M | $42M | -$649M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $542,591 | $146M | $1.2B | $653M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $7M | $1.2B | $5M | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.10x | — | 14.46x | — | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $25,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $241 for MKDW. Over the past 12 months, QCOM leads with a +53.4% total return vs MKDW's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 30.3% vs MKDW's -71.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.3% | +15.3% | +4.8% | +16.0% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.4% | +43.3% | +3.4% | +7.7% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +121.3% | -28.7% | +26.9% | +111.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +152.5% | -52.0% | -83.6% | +82.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -31.0% | +33.9% | -89.2% | +382.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.2% | +30.3% | -10.7% | +8.3% | +28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKDW and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TUYA's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QCOM currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs MKDW's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 1.44x | 1.30x | 1.76x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.12 | $19.94 | $90.90 | $2.95 | $228.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $10.30 | $51.92 | $1.99 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.6% | +76.5% | +73.5% | +84.1% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 57.9 | 56.1 | 52.4 | 82.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 1.4M | 3.3M | 1.5M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWKS and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARLO as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", TUYA as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for TUYA (target: $4) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs QCOM's 1.57%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 | $72.30 | $3.69 | $185.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 60 | 2 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.2% | +2.3% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 12 | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.79 | $0.06 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +0.4% | +0.0% | +3.8% |
QCOM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MKDW vs ARLO vs SWKS vs TUYA vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 5% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Tuya Inc. at 291. 8x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +152. 5%, compared to -97. 6% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +382. 4% versus MKDW's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKDWELL Tech Inc.
(MKDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Tuya Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning TUYA is approximately 153% more volatile than MKDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tuya Inc. (TUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tuya Inc.
(TUYA) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -45. 5% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -62. 7% for MKDWELL Tech Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLO leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -126. 0% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -141. 3% for MKDW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for QUALCOMM Incorporated — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TUYA: 48. 8% to $3. 69.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
2% yield), TUYA (2. 3% yield), QCOM (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. MKDW, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKDW or ARLO or SWKS or TUYA or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +33. 9%, ARLO: -31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKDW and ARLO and SWKS and TUYA and QCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKDW (Consumer Cyclical) and ARLO (Industrials) and SWKS (Technology) and TUYA (Technology) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MKDW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TUYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SWKS, TUYA, QCOM pay a dividend while MKDW, ARLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.