Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Semiconductors
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $124M | $219M | $1.62B | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $150M | $561M | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-25M | $31M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 34.4% | 45.1% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -141.3% | -1.0% | 2.7% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 18.7x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $7M | $7M | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $543K | $105M | $146M | $7.84B |
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 251.7 | +151.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKDW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.59
- Beta 0.59, current ratio 0.29x
- Beta 0.59 vs SMRT's 1.78
SMRT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARLO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 145.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 5.3%, current ratio 1.51x
- Better valuation composite
- +43.3% vs MKDW's -26.8%
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 350.2% 10Y total return vs ARLO's -32.6%
- 13.7% revenue growth vs MKDW's -45.5%
- 22.3% margin vs MKDW's -126.0%
- 1.7% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs MKDW's -45.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs MKDW's -126.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs SMRT's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs MKDW's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs MKDW's -27.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -51.5% |
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 1 of 6 categories
ARLO leads 1 • MKDW leads 0 • SMRT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 22255.0x MKDW's $2M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKDW's -126.0%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $150M | $561M | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $5M | $18M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25M | $31M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$16M | $64M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +34.4% | +45.1% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -141.3% | -1.0% | +2.7% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -126.0% | -16.6% | +5.5% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -157.4% | -10.9% | +11.5% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -6.4% | +26.3% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +90.5% | — | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMRT and QCOM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 62% valuation discount to ARLO's 106.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 148.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $219M | $1.6B | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $131M | $122M | $1.5B | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -49.10x | -3.56x | 106.43x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 18.71x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 148.35x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 61.85x | 1.44x | 3.07x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.93x | 12.84x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 24.27x | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ARLO and QCOM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SMRT. SMRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs MKDW's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -10.6% | +22.9% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.9% | -7.6% | +9.1% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -51.5% | -19.6% | +35.9% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -12.4% | +4.7% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$97M | -$140M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $542,591 | $105M | $146M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $7M | $7M | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.10x | -78.29x | — | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARLO five years ago would be worth $22,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $243 for MKDW. Over the past 12 months, ARLO leads with a +43.3% total return vs MKDW's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARLO at 29.3% vs MKDW's -71.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.8% | -40.9% | +12.6% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | +21.9% | +43.3% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -57.5% | +116.3% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -89.5% | +123.1% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -86.8% | -32.6% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.1% | -24.8% | +29.3% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MKDW and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMRT's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QCOM currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs MKDW's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 1.62x | 1.44x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.12 | $2.20 | $19.94 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $0.72 | $10.20 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.0% | +51.8% | +74.7% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 29.9 | 54.0 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 905K | 1.3M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMRT as "Hold", ARLO as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SMRT (target: $4) vs -8.4% for QCOM (target: $186). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.00 | $19.00 | $185.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 10 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +4.1% |
QCOM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ARLO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MKDW vs SMRT vs ARLO vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger pick with 13.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 5% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Arlo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) delivered a total return of +123. 1%, compared to -97. 6% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +382. 4% versus MKDW's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKDWELL Tech Inc.
(MKDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 1. 64β — meaning QCOM is approximately 136% more volatile than MKDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is pulling ahead at 13.
7% versus -45. 5% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. (MKDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -88. 2% for SmartRent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARLO leads at 2. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -126. 0% for MKDWELL Tech Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -141. 3% for MKDW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) trades at 18. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for QUALCOMM Incorporated — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMRT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MKDW, SMRT, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKDW or SMRT or ARLO or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MKDWELL Tech Inc.
(MKDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69)). SmartRent, Inc. (SMRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKDW: -97. 6%, SMRT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKDW and SMRT and ARLO and QCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKDW (Consumer Cyclical) and SMRT (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
QCOM pays a dividend while MKDW, SMRT, ARLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.