Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Real Estate - Services
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Travel Services | Travel Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $44M | $4.52B | $132.72B | $14.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $321M | $1.04B | $27.69B | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $57M | $6.15B | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 86.2% | 73.4% | 100.0% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 14.1% | 34.3% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 73.2x | 16.3x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $237M | $19.29B | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $509M | $17.20B | $1.73B |
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 328.8 | +228.8% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 250.3 | +150.3% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKTW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 11.8%
- Beta 0.37, yield 11.8%, current ratio 0.56x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 25.8x)
- Beta 0.37 vs MMYT's 1.17
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 25.0% revenue growth vs MKTW's -19.7%
BKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs MMYT's 190.1%
- 22.2% margin vs CSGP's 0.7%
- 21.1% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2%
CSGP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs MKTW's -19.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs CSGP's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs MMYT's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 11.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BKNG's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs CSGP's 0.2% |
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKTW leads 2 • MMYT leads 1 • CSGP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 86.3x MKTW's $321M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSGP's 0.7%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $321M | $1.0B | $27.7B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $175M | $10.2B | $278M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $57M | $6.2B | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $224M | $9.0B | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.2% | +73.4% | +100.0% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +14.1% | +34.3% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +5.5% | +22.2% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +21.5% | +32.6% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.5% | +10.6% | +16.2% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.1% | -68.3% | +2.4% | +127.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MKTW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, MKTW trades at a 100% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKNG's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 83.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $4.5B | $132.7B | $14.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$20M | $4.3B | $134.8B | $14.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.20x | 60.86x | 25.87x | 2107.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.17x | 16.32x | 25.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.31x | 28.92x | 13.41x | 83.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.62x | 4.93x | 4.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.79x | — | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.96x | 26.07x | 14.61x | 361.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $0 for CSGP. CSGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMYT's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs MKTW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +8.2% | — | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +3.1% | +21.1% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.2% | — | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.2% | +75.4% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.20x | — | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | -$272M | $2.1B | -$589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $509M | $17.2B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $237M | $19.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.67x | 7.21x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,170 for MKTW. Over the past 12 months, MKTW leads with a +32.6% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 25.5% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | -38.3% | -19.4% | -46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.6% | -54.9% | -16.8% | -53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.4% | +97.5% | +65.4% | -52.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.3% | +97.0% | +87.6% | -58.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.2% | +190.1% | +250.7% | +77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.1% | +25.5% | +18.3% | -22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MKTW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKTW is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MMYT's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKTW currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.74 | $113.85 | $5129.83 | $97.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.37 | $32.84 | $150.62 | $33.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +44.4% | +3.3% | +35.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 59.4 | 42.4 | 30.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 1.5M | 8.7M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKTW and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKTW as "Hold", MMYT as "Buy", BKNG as "Buy", CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs -79.0% for MKTW (target: $4). For income investors, MKTW offers the higher dividend yield at 11.79% vs BKNG's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $91.00 | $231.72 | $61.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 71 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.8% | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.96 | — | $1.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.7% | +0.5% | +4.9% | +3.9% |
BKNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MKTW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MKTW vs MMYT vs BKNG vs CSGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
On trailing P/E, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, Booking Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -88. 3% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus MKTW's -88. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus MakeMyTrip Limited's 1. 17β — meaning MMYT is approximately 217% more volatile than MKTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 20% for MakeMyTrip Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus -19. 7% for MarketWise, Inc. (MKTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Booking Holdings Inc. grew EPS -4. 2% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 0. 2% for CoStar Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus -2. 2% for CSGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 56. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP?
In this comparison, MKTW (11.
8% yield), BKNG (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MMYT, CSGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKTW or MMYT or BKNG or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MarketWise, Inc.
(MKTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 11. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKTW: -88. 2%, MMYT: +190. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKTW and MMYT and BKNG and CSGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MKTW (Technology) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and BKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MKTW is a small-cap deep-value stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MKTW, BKNG pay a dividend while MMYT, CSGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.