Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $45M | $2.01B | $485M | $483M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $723M | $282M | $440M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $159M | $-17M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 63.4% | 63.2% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 14.8% | -7.3% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 1.9x | 13.4x | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $279M | $44M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $553M | $146M | $91M |
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 35.0 | -65.0% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MLGO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 8.9x)
MGNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1%
- 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
- 5.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 9.5% vs -6.8%
PUBM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PERI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- 139.6% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs MLGO's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 8.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs MLGO's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs MLGO's -94.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 9.5% vs -6.8% |
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories
PERI leads 2 • MLGO leads 1 • PUBM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGNI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $723M annually — 11.8x MLGO's $61M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, PERI holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $723M | $282M | $440M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $145M | $11M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $159M | -$17M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $44M | $43M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +63.4% | +63.2% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +14.8% | -7.3% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +22.0% | -6.2% | -1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +6.1% | +15.1% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.3% | +5.5% | -2.0% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +142.9% | -35.0% | +72.7% |
Valuation Metrics
MLGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.9x trailing earnings, MLGO trades at a 87% valuation discount to MGNI's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $2.0B | $485M | $483M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$126M | $1.7B | $384M | $434M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.94x | 14.74x | -33.03x | -56.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.45x | — | 8.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -133.59x | 11.43x | 14.47x | 106.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 2.81x | 1.72x | 1.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 2.33x | 1.83x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.13x | 12.11x | 7.28x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. MLGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLGO scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +18.6% | -7.0% | -1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +5.3% | -2.6% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +9.5% | -6.8% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +7.3% | -5.5% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$275M | -$102M | -$49M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $553M | $146M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $279M | $44M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 4.03x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PERI five years ago would be worth $6,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for MLGO. Over the past 12 months, PERI leads with a +16.9% total return vs MLGO's -94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs MLGO's -92.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.7% | -12.8% | +19.2% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.4% | +12.6% | +2.0% | +16.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +58.7% | -18.5% | -68.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -60.9% | -77.1% | -37.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -4.7% | -65.2% | +139.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.8% | +16.7% | -6.6% | -31.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLGO's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs MLGO's 3.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.29x | 1.63x | 1.51x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $117.00 | $26.65 | $13.88 | $11.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $10.82 | $6.21 | $8.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.5% | +52.5% | +73.8% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 55.4 | 66.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 2.1M | 746K | 321K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGNI as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy", PERI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for PUBM (target: $14) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $14.00 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | +9.6% | +14.7% |
MGNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PERI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MLGO vs MGNI vs PUBM vs PERI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) offers the better valuation at 1. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
On trailing P/E, MicroAlgo Inc.
(MLGO) is the cheapest at 1. 9x versus Magnite, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
Over the past 5 years, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +139. 6% versus MLGO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus MicroAlgo Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning MLGO is approximately 143% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -19. 1% for MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
MicroAlgo Inc.
(MLGO) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PUBM leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Magnite, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PUBM: 36. 7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MLGO or MGNI or PUBM or PERI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +139. 6% 10Y return). MicroAlgo Inc. (MLGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PERI: +139. 6%, MLGO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MLGO and MGNI and PUBM and PERI?
These companies operate in different sectors (MLGO (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and PUBM (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MLGO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.